Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Sir James Colquhoun v. The Trustees of the late John Wilson — Answers, 16 Mar 1857

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by the defenders to the statement of facts made by the pursuer, denying that any feu-contract was concluded and asserting that the pursuer's terms are objectionable and not agreed to.

APPENDIX. GENERAL SUMMARY of the ACCOUNTS of the Trustees of the late ALEXANDER GRAHAM, Esquire of Ballagan. CHARGE. I. Capital. II. Proceeds of Wood cut by the Trustees. III. Inco

Abstract
AI-generated
Trustees' accounts for Alexander Graham's estate detail capital, income, and expenditures from 1841 to 1855, showing a final surplus of £115 2s 1d.

John Dalrymple v. William Gall and James Forbes — Note, 8 Dec 1836 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Advocator seeks judgment against Gall and Forbes, asserting Forbes as trustee cannot be held liable for debt not paid, and that Gall’s claim lacks legal foundation.

John Dalrymple v. William Gall and James Forbes — Note of Advocation, 31 Jul 1855

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer seeks debt repayment from bankrupt defendant via oath-based proof; trustee defends and appeals interlocutor allowing such proof.

John Dalrymple v. William Gall and James Forbes — Note of Advocation, 23 Jan 1855

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer claims unpaid loans from bankrupt defender, but trustee may set off half for joint property work.

[Rec. Note boxed March 3, 1857. Appendix to Reclaiming Note, Alexander Smith against Lord Mackenzie's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Alexander Smith petitions for enforcement of farm servant contracts after servants deserted service over food quality, leading to magisterial imprisonment and wage abatement orders.

II.—CONDESCENDENCE for Pursuer, and ANSWERS for DEFENDERS.

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders deny liability for irregular Justices' proceedings leading to imprisonment and subsequent damages action by a former servant.

Alexander Smith v. James Grant and George Leslie — Reclaiming Petition, 17 Feb 1857

Abstract
AI-generated
Reclaiming Petition of Alexander Smith, farmer, Stonewells, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor and decern against the defenders in terms of the summons.

Colonel John Gordon v. James Campbell Brodie — Reclaiming Note, 3 Feb 1857 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer claims right to public road land encroached upon by defender, asserting historical grant and trustee illegality; defender denies encroachment and asserts ownership.

The Caledonian Insurance Company v. The British Linen Company — 12 Dec 1857

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers ordered to produce correspondence with William Harvie regarding claims against the British Linen Company.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 398
  • Page 399
  • Page 400
  • Page 401
  • Current page 402
  • Page 403
  • Page 404
  • Page 405
  • Page 406
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in