Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

V.—EXCERPT from Revised Answers for the DEFENDERS, No. 547 of Process. XI.—Law Expenses, and Expenses of Management.

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders seek account taxation at pursuer’s expense, challenging denial of professional trouble charges permitted under trust deed allowing trustee gratuity for trouble and responsibility.

2.—REVISED CONDESCENDENCE for the Pursuer, WITH 3.—REVISED DEFENCES for the Defender Inglis.

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer claims £1070 and interest from defender who cashed a deposit receipt after deceased owner’s death, asserting wrongful appropriation; defender counters that he held receipt via valid indorsement and acted lawfully with bank’s consent.

Charles Murray Barstow v. William Inglis — Reclaiming Note, 24 Jun 1857

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer seeks £1070 restitution from Union Bank via judicial factor, alleging unlawful fund uplift by defender without warrant.

III.—STATEMENT of FACTS for Defender, Robert Crawford, and ANSWERS thereto for Pursuers.

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender Robert Crawford defends conveyances of heritable property to himself and Mrs Climie during minor’s guardianship, asserting beneficial transactions and valid security interests.

II.—REVISED CONDESCENDENCE for Pursuers, and REVISED DEFENCES thereto for Robert Crawford, Defender.

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender seeks to annul prior proceedings and claim £100 from pursuer, who asserts inheritance rights and challenges validity of property transactions involving Robert Crawford.

Mary Ralston Nicholl and William Henney v. James Crawford, John Hair, Robert Crawford, and Mrs Mary M'Clyment or Climie — Condescendence, 30 May 1854

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers seek reduction of disputed conveyances involving the Eagle Inn in Cumnock, challenging validity of articles of roup, disposals, and sasines by defenders including Robert Crawford.

III.—STATEMENT of FACTS for Respondent, Robert Crawford, and ANSWERS thereto for SUSPENDERS.

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents deny allegations that they improperly sold heritable property of minor suspender Mary Nicholl without judicial authority, and assert they acted to recover debts secured by prior bonds.

Mary Ralston Nicholl and William Henney v. James Crawford, John Hair, and Robert Crawford — Bill of Suspension, 17 Oct 1853

Abstract
AI-generated
Bill of Suspension for Mary Ralston Nicholl, a minor, and William Henney, her curator, against James Crawford, John Hair, and Robert Crawford, alleging unauthorized sale and mismanagement of her estate.

Mary Ralston Nicholl and Others v. James Crawford and Others — Record, 25 Jun 1857

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer seeks reduction of heritable security over property due to alleged minority, lesion, and fraudulent transactions by defender acting as agent for minor.

Bank of Scotland v. Taylor's Trustees — Answers

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders deny owing debt claimed by Bank of Scotland, asserting no vouchers exist and payments were made by factor, not trustees, without acknowledgment of specific debts.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 397
  • Page 398
  • Page 399
  • Page 400
  • Current page 401
  • Page 402
  • Page 403
  • Page 404
  • Page 405
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in