Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

James Brown v. Robert Crawford Cumming — Note of Advocation, 12 Nov 1857

Abstract
AI-generated
Sheriff court action for road and fence construction under feu contract, with inspector’s report approved and obligations ordered.

Isaac Graham v. Robert Little — Statement of Facts, 30 Jun 1857

Abstract
AI-generated
Statement of Facts for Robert Little, Defender; and Answers for Isaac Graham, Pursuer; with Pleas in Law for both parties and Interlocutor

Isaac Graham v. Robert Little — Answers, 27 Feb 1857

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Robert Little to the petition of Isaac Graham, asserting that the terms of the disposition and settlement are admitted only as stated, and denying claims of sole executorship and inheritance rights.

Isaac Graham v. Robert Little — State of the Process, 2 Jul 1857

Abstract
AI-generated
Executor-dative Isaac Graham sues executor-nominate Robert Little for payment of £425 due under a 1818 disposition, less £50 paid and interest, plus process costs.

John Johnston v. Adam Black — Reclaiming Note

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender Adam Black seeks to reclaim an interlocutor finding him liable for expenses, arguing the payment was bona fide and no device was proven.

VI.—REVISED CONDESCENDENCE for ALEXANDER STEVEN, No. 20 of Process. WITH REVISED ANSWERS THERETO FOR

Abstract
AI-generated
Alexander Steven and his children claim £35,000 of a £50,000 legacy under a trust, with assignees claiming £15,000; trustees contest power to discharge and reserve fee for future children.

V.—REVISED CONDESCENDENCE for JAMES HAMILTON, No. 19 of Process. Tailor in Irvine; with REVISED ANSWERS THERETO FOR

Abstract
AI-generated
Trustees seek to enforce a legacy of £5,000 to James Hamilton, with claimants disputing entitlement and age of claimant.

II.—REVISED CONDESCENDENCE for JOHN HAMILTON, Baker No. 17 of Process in Irvine, ALEXANDER HAMILTON, MARGARET HAMILTON, JOHN FERGUSON HAMILTON, and ROBERT JOHNSTON HAMILTON, his ch

Abstract
AI-generated
Trustees of John Ferguson’s estate administer a codicil bequest of £20,000 to John Hamilton’s children, with contested claims from other heirs and trustees’ authority to adjust payment timing.

Trustees of the late John Ferguson of Cairnbrock v. James Hamilton and Others — Summons, 18 Nov 1856

Abstract
AI-generated
Trustees seek judicial determination of rightful heirs and exoneration after advancing funds to defenders.

Trustees of the late John Ferguson of Cairnbrock v. James Hamilton and Others — Record, 20 May 1857

Abstract
AI-generated
Trustees of late John Ferguson sue James Hamilton and others in multiplepoinding and exoneration proceedings.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 396
  • Page 397
  • Page 398
  • Page 399
  • Current page 400
  • Page 401
  • Page 402
  • Page 403
  • Page 404
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in