Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Robert Chalmers and James Duncan v. John Watson — Note of Advocation

Abstract
AI-generated
Residuary legatee sues trustees for unpaid commission and disputed trust account; court denies commission due to low risk and orders balance held pending charge adjustment.

Robert Chalmers v. John Watson — Reclaiming Note, 20 Mar 1858

Abstract
AI-generated
Defendant John Watson seeks to reclaim expenses and commission from pursuers Robert Chalmers and James Duncan over trust-estate management.

Peter Ferrie and Spouse v. George Ferrie and Others — Minute, 20 Dec 1856

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer seeks to realign action after defender George Ferrie’s death, seeking to add trustees and suspend proceedings pending consultation with mandatory.

REVISED CONDESCENDENCE for Pursuers, and REVISED ANSWERS for Defenders.

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers challenge 1845 deed’s validity, claiming fraud, error, and unauthorized changes that undermined annuity rights and estate distribution.

III.—STATEMENT of FACTS for DEFENDER, WITH ANSWERS thereto for PURSUERS; IV.—PLEAS in LAW for Pursuers; V.—PLEAS in LAW for Defender; VI.—INTERLOCUTOR CLOSING RECORD.

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender denies ordering wheel and pinion, claims pursuers failed to deliver and overcharged account.

Redpath, Brown, & Co. v. Alexander G. Mackenzie — 16 Mar 1858

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers seek to establish ownership of ironworks; Defender contests wording of Issue and denies liability for damages without substantive action.

John Hamilton Colt v. Caledonian Railway Company — Joint Minute, 1854

Abstract
AI-generated
Parties settle land and railway access claims via connections, £463 compensation, and discharge of all future claims except one tenant dispute.

APPENDIX. No. I. A CORRESPONDENCE between the Agents of John Hamilton Colt, Esquire of Gartsherrie, and the Agents of the Caledonian Railway Company.

Abstract
AI-generated
John Hamilton Colt claims compensation for land and damage from Caledonian Railway’s proposed line alterations, seeking settlement or court action.

STATEMENT of FACTS for the Defenders, and ANSWERS thereto for the Pursuer.

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer seeks damages for land taken and railway interference; defenders deny liability, citing lack of notice, prior talks, and statutory compensation limits.

John Hamilton Colt v. The Caledonian Railway Company — Reclaiming Note, 23 Feb 1858

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer seeks relief from defenders for damages incurred in defending a separate action brought by Macdonald, alleging the defenders' refusal to restore railway connection caused Macdonald's loss.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 394
  • Page 395
  • Page 396
  • Page 397
  • Current page 398
  • Page 399
  • Page 400
  • Page 401
  • Page 402
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in