Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

2.—REVISED CONDESCENDENCE for Pursuer; AND REVISED ANSWERS thereto for Defender.

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer, trustee in Gowan’s sequestration, claims assignation of security over Abbey Hill/Dublin Street to recover estate rents; Defender denies, asserting priority of £900 bond and right to apply rents to prior £1200 debt.

1.—SUMMONS. 2.—REVISED CONDESCENDENCE for Pursuer; AND REVISED ANSWERS thereto for Defender.

Abstract
AI-generated
Trustee seeks decree to assign heritable security over Abbey Hill and Dublin Street properties to recover debts from defender, who received rents and price of George Street flat.

David Scott v. John Fothringham — Reclaiming Note, 19 Feb 1858

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender seeks to reclaim possession and apply rents from George Street flat to discharge his own debt, challenging pursuer’s claim to those proceeds.

Craig (now Lindsay) v. Monypenny's Representatives and Dalgleish — Appendix, 22 Feb 1858

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer challenges Monypenny’s accounting, remuneration, and implied contract, disputing his salary raise, lack of oversight, and unauthorized role as sole trustee.

STATEMENT of FACTS for the DEFENDERS, and ANSWERS thereto for Pursuers.

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders, trustees of the Clyde Navigation, deny liability for poor-rates, asserting statutory exemption and public purpose of revenues.

REVISED CONDESCENDENCE for the Pursuers and REVISED ANSWERS thereto for DEFENDERS.

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers seek relief from poor-rate assessment on defenders' trust property; defenders contest liability and valuation under Poor Law and Clyde Trust statutes.

Ebenezer Adamson and Others v. Clyde Navigation Trustees and Others — Reclaiming Note, 2 Feb 1858

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers, including Glasgow property owners and the Parochial Board, claim Clyde Navigation Trustees must be assessed for poor rates based on their property and toll revenues within Glasgow parish.

Robert Crawford Cumming v. James Brown — State of the Process, 11 Aug 1857

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent admits obligation to build road and fence per feu-contract but denies road was satisfactorily made; petitioner seeks decree for completion and expenses.

Robert Crawford Cumming v. James Brown — Condescendence, 1856

Abstract
AI-generated
Condescendence and Answers for Robert Crawford Cumming, Esq. of Barremman, petitioner; and James Brown, Wright in Glasgow, defender, responding to allegations of unfulfilled feu obligations.

James Brown v. Robert Crawford Cumming — Bill of Advocation, 12 Nov 1857 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner seeks to compel respondent to complete road and fencing per feu contract, challenging prior interlocutors as legally erroneous.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 395
  • Page 396
  • Page 397
  • Page 398
  • Current page 399
  • Page 400
  • Page 401
  • Page 402
  • Page 403
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in