Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Margaret Anderson, John Wylie, Jane Anderson, Phoebe Anderson, Joannes Anderson, Priscilla Anderson, and Hugh Anderson v. John Boyd Junior — Answers, 27 Feb 1823

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent insists petitioners must prove the tenor of a prior settlement deed before reduction can proceed.

Peter M'Intyre v. James Tweedie — Answers, 1 Mar 1823

Abstract
AI-generated
Trustee seeks reimbursement for sequestration costs from petitioner who guaranteed them, after bankruptcy discharge and judicial cautioners’ insolvency.

The Company of Proprietors of the Monkland Navigation v. William Young — Memorial, 5 Sep 1822

Abstract
AI-generated
Company of Proprietors argues the 45th Navigation Act penalty applies to all cargo, not just excess over ticketed tonnage, across all three listed offences.

Tucker, Fenton, and Company v. William Baird and James Whyte and Son — Duplies, 25 Apr 1818

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents challenge petitioners' attempt to revive a sequestration via summary application, arguing it is incompetent and unjust.

REP.—W. BAIRD & J. WHYTE & SON, TO ANS.—TUCKER, FENTON, & CO. John White, W. S. Petitioners' Agent. Campbell & Clason, W. S. Respondents' Agents. Mr Buchanan, Clerk. REPLIES FOR WI

Abstract
AI-generated
William Baird, James Whyte & Son (Glasgow) reply to Tucker, Fenton & Co. (Sheffield) et al., disputing contract validity and sequestration revival.

Andrew Bogle v. Andrew Gordon — Answers, 9 Apr 1818 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent seeks to build up a piazza in front of his shop to eliminate filth and danger, opposing petitioner's claim that it encroaches on public space.

Petition — Dr. Robert Auld against Inner House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of Dr. Robert Auld asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

APPENDIX. EXCERPTS from the Records of the Presbytery of Ayr.

Abstract
AI-generated
Presbytery of Ayr records from 1642 detail parish visitations, manse and glebe status, and ministerial declarations regarding property integrity and adequacy.

Dr. Robert Auld v. The Heritors of the Town and Parish of Ayr — Information

Abstract
AI-generated
Information of Dr. Robert Auld, First Minister of Ayr, arguing that the parish of Ayr was landward, contained two religious establishments at the reformation, and that the glebe in question is valid despite being in two portions.

Answers — Ans.—Mrs Christian Pirnie, to Pet.—Alexander Macritchie. Brodie & Imlach, W.S. Respondent's Agents

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent opposes petitioner’s floor conversions to shops, citing structural risk and lack of authority under the 1787 feuing agreement.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 383
  • Page 384
  • Page 385
  • Page 386
  • Current page 387
  • Page 388
  • Page 389
  • Page 390
  • Page 391
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in