Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Eleanor Allardyce and Archibald Lord Kennedy v. John Innes — Answers, 3 Apr 1823

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers Lady Kennedy and Lord Kennedy oppose John Innes's petition concerning his interest.

APPENDIX. Note of Lands which are in the Adjudication, but not in the Conveyance by the Trustee to the Ladies.

Abstract
AI-generated
Appendix listing lands adjudicated but not conveyed by trustee to the ladies, detailing properties in Semistoun, Clifton, Kelso, and others with teinds and pertinents.

APPENDIX. No. I. BOND by James Stewart and Others, in favour of James Miller.

Abstract
AI-generated
Bond executed by six merchants to secure payment of Robert Menzies’s final composition instalment to creditors via James Miller.

APPENDIX. No I. CORRESPONDENCE betwixt Mr. URE and Mr. GUTHRIE, referred to in Mr. Ure's Deposition of 11th December 1822.

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition to review interlocutors in a composition bond dispute involving cautioners' rights and obligations.

William Guthrie v. James Curl — Answers, 9 Jul 1822

Abstract
AI-generated
Law agent seeks summary payment from creditors for sequestration expenses, despite trustee’s role and statutory provision requiring payment from bankrupt or friends.

Petition — William Guthrie against an Inner House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner seeks reimbursement for sequestration costs, disputing denial of claim against creditors, asserting he acted as their agent, not trustee, and no fraud or collusion occurred.

James Chalmers v. Mrs Agnes Law or Bryden — Answers, 28 Aug 1820

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by the defenders to the argument made by James Chalmers, asserting that the pursuer has no title to insist in this action of Declarator of Redemption.

Petition — James Chambers against Lord Alloway's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of James Chambers asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

David Morison, James Inches Jun. and Robert Hepburn v. William Robertson — Answers, 23 Feb 1822

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender William Robertson answers a condescendence alleging no claim, asserting he had a valid claim recognized by arbiters and that pursuers knew of it.

Petition — David Morrison & Others against Inner House Interlocutor [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioners, trustees for George Turnbull’s creditors, seek to overturn an interlocutor that sustains a double-ranking of debtor William Robertson’s claim against Turnbull’s estate, alleging arbiters exceeded their powers and erred in calculation.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 382
  • Page 383
  • Page 384
  • Page 385
  • Current page 386
  • Page 387
  • Page 388
  • Page 389
  • Page 390
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in