Andrew Stevens v. Robert Grahame Burden — Answers
Abstract
Pursuer seeks reimbursement of litigation expenses from defender, who claims he was not dominus litis but merely funded his son’s defense.
Andrew Stevens v. Robert Grahame Burden — Condescendence
Abstract
Pursuer seeks reimbursement for expenses incurred in a Commissary Court declarator of marriage process, alleging defender orchestrated litigation against his son and paid agents to delay diligence.
James Hogg v. Thomas Minorgan — Condescendence, 5 Dec 1821
Abstract
Pursuer condescends to admit supplying cloth to defender's family, but claims unpaid balance from Thomas Minorgan's guarantee.
Hogg v. Minorgan — Proof
Abstract
Witnesses testify that Thomas Minorgan took goods for his son Alexander Minorgan and agreed to pay or ensure payment, while disputing whether he offered a settlement to a creditor.
Petition — James Hogg against Lord Pitmilly's Interlocutor
Abstract
Petitioner seeks to recover goods sold on credit to his son, alleging respondent’s introduction and implied guarantee, despite his defence of limited cautionary obligation.
Culloden's Trustees v. Lockhart Kinloch — State of the Process, 1755
Abstract
Estate accounting dispute between Kinloch and Culloden’s trustees over unrecorded rents, disputed payments, and commission claims, with Kinloch’s records lacking proper vouchers or debits.
Mr Claud Russell, Accountant, and Others, Trustees of Duncan George Forbes, Esquire, of Culloden v. Lockhart Kinloch, Esq. — Accountant's Report, 28 Jan 1823
Abstract
Accountant reports on final balance in conjoined processes between Culloden's trustees and Lockhart Kinloch, seeking confirmation of interim decrees against Kinloch.
ANSWERS for Lockhart Kinloch, Esq. Sheriff-Clerk of Inverness, to the NOTE of this date by the Accountant, In Remit of Processes with Culloden and his Trustees.
Abstract
Answers by Lockhart Kinloch, Sheriff-Clerk of Inverness, to the note of this date by the Accountant, in remit of processes with Culloden and his Trustees.
APPENDIX. No. I. NOTE of the Particulars of the Amount of Omissions and Corrections, stated at p. 63 of Petition.
Abstract
Petitioner disputes accountant’s rent charges, citing ledger evidence of misattributed payments to crop 1806 vs. 1805 and omission of arrears from tenant William Mackintosh (1801).
Lockhart Kinloch v. Culloden and his Trustees — Answers, 18 Jan 1823
Abstract
Answers by Mr Lockhart Kinloch to the Note by the Accountant of 17th January, 1823, asserting that the accountant's refusal to deliver exhibits denied him opportunity to remark upon them.
