Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Petition — A. M'RITCHIE against Inner-House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of Alexander M'Ritchie asking the Court to recall its recent interlocutor against his proposed alterations to a tenement in South Hanover Street, Edinburgh.

Alexander M'Ritchie v. Mrs Christian Pirnie — Information, 25 Feb 1819

Abstract
AI-generated
Information of Alexander M'Ritchie, Confectioner in Edinburgh, arguing that alterations to his purchased premises in South Hanover Street may be legally executed without endangering the tenement, despite opposition from Mrs Christian Pirnie, the widow of the original builder.

Mrs Christian Pirnie v. Alex. MacRitchie — Information, 18 Feb 1819

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer seeks to alter shared tenement walls and convert residential space to shops, contested by informant citing structural danger and breach of special contractual rights.

Petition — Douglas, Brown, & Company. against Inner House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of Douglas, Brown, and Company, merchants in Glasgow, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

William Mylne v. Douglas, Brown, and Company — Answers, 12 Nov 1817

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Douglas, Brown, & Co. to the petition of William Mylne, arguing that a bona fide settlement of insurance premiums occurred prior to the bankruptcy of Liddell and Reid.

Petition — William Mylne against Lord Pitmilly's Interlocutors [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of William Mylne, Merchant in Leith, asking the Court to overturn Lord Pitmilly's interlocutor in an Admiralty action against Douglas, Brown, and Co.

ANS.—DAVID AITKEN, TO THE PETITION for WILLIAM MURRAY, &c. ANSWERS FOR DAVID AITKEN, Tacksman at Rhives, TO THE PETITION for WILLIAM MURRAY and SON, Agents at Tain for the Commerci

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by David Aitken, Tacksman at Rhives, to the petition for William Murray and Son, Agents at Tain for the Commercial Banking Company of Scotland, responding to the claim that diligence must be suspended.

David Aiken v. William Murray and Son — Answers

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by David Aiken, Tacksman of Rhives, suspender, to the Condescendence for William Murray and Son, agents at Tain, for the Commercial Banking Company of Scotland,—Chargers.

William Murray and Son v. David Aiken — Condescendence [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Chargers allege Aiken, the suspender, misrepresented facts and withheld evidence to avoid paying a discounted bill due Dec 1, 1816.

Stephenson v. Stephenson — Appendix, 18 Apr 1808

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers claim entitlement to shares of deceased William Stephenson's estate under legitim and executry rights, challenging trustees' possession under a 1807 trust-disposition.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 384
  • Page 385
  • Page 386
  • Page 387
  • Current page 388
  • Page 389
  • Page 390
  • Page 391
  • Page 392
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in