Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

APPENDIX. No. I. BOND and OBLIGATION by William Harley and Trustees, to Archibald Campbell of Blythswood.

Abstract
AI-generated
Trustees and William Harley bond to Archibald Campbell of Blythswood for feu-duties and rents due by Martinmas 1817, with penalty and legal interest.

Alexander Bryce and Alexander Graham v. Monteith, Bogle, & Co. — Answers, 28 Feb 1817

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers challenge petitioners' bill claim, asserting their right to pursue under a creditor-approved composition that reserved preference recovery rights.

Petition — Monteath, Bogle & Co. against Inner-house Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioners challenge pursuer's right to reduce a debt based on a discountable bill, arguing the claim was not disclosed in bankruptcy composition.

George Deuchar and Others v. John Watt — Petition and Complaint, 29 Jun 1818

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioners, as cautioners, seek to void a composition contract due to creditor John Watt’s fraud, including accepting bribes and forfeiting his debt under the 1766 Act.

Petition — January 11. 1820. Petition John Mackie against an Inner-House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of John Mackie, agent for the Paisley Banking Company at Stranraer, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

Thomas Billinge and Robert Wilkinson v. Richard Arkwright — Answers, 8 Oct 1818

Abstract
AI-generated
Richard Arkwright defends heritable security over cotton mill machinery against petitioners seeking to strip it from the property.

Thomas Billinge and Robert Wilkinson v. Richard Arkwright — Answers, 30 Jun 1817

Abstract
AI-generated
Arkwright defends heritable bond over Paisley mills, claiming machinery as accessory property under security, supported by insurance and rent possession.

William Johnson v. James Scott and Son — Petition, 9 Apr 1818

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of William Johnson asking the Court to overturn Lord Cringletie's interlocutor refusing a bill of advocation

ADDITIONS to Mr MARTIN's Condescendence, after perusing the Condescendence for the Chargers.

Abstract
AI-generated
Chargers seek to enforce ferry rights over Holmfoot lands; suspender opposes, arguing no legal entitlement and public boat fares must be paid.

Archibald Martin v. Mrs Christian Howison and others — Condescendence

Abstract
AI-generated
Suspender claims exclusive ferry rights and minimal fares; chargers deny this, citing historical free passage for services rendered and ownership of their own boat.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 386
  • Page 387
  • Page 388
  • Page 389
  • Current page 390
  • Page 391
  • Page 392
  • Page 393
  • Page 394
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in