Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

James Thomson v. Peter Clark — Reclaiming Petition, 14 Jun 1809

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner seeks to reverse dismissal of his damages claim against Captain Clark, asserting a prior binding agreement despite Clark’s later preference for another shipper’s cargo.

Peter Clark & Others v. James Thomson — Answers, 20 Apr 1809

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by James Thomson to the petition of Peter Clark and others, responding to the claim that the respondent's goods were wrongfully rejected on board the Perseverance

James Thomson v. Peter Clark — Appendix, 23 Jun 1808

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender Peter Clark denies agreeing to carry petitioner’s goods, claims vessel is full, and protests were taken without his consent.

Peter Clark, Colin Gillespie, Leslie Mac-Naught & Co. v. James Thomson — Petition, 7 Mar 1809

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioners challenge Lord Robertson's reversal of judgments in favor of them in a freight dispute with James Thomson, asserting no contract existed for Thomson's goods and that the ship was fully contracted to others.

Thomas Farquharson v. William Spalding — Answers, 2 Mar 1809

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by William Spalding of Glenkilry to the petition of Thomas Farquharson, asserting that the executors' claims are founded on misrepresentations and unjust accumulation of interest.

Petition — Tho. Farquharson, Esq; & Others against an Inner-House interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioners seek reconsideration of interlocutor denying interest accumulation on funds held by tutor at law, arguing for annual accrual during tutory period.

Watson Stotts and Ebenezer Stotts v. Sir Alexander Gordon — Reclaiming Petition, 9 Jun 1809

Abstract
AI-generated
Reclaiming Petition of Archibald Colquhoun, His Majesty's Advocate, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

Petition — Sir Alex. Gordon against Inner-House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of Sir Alexander Gordon, Knight, Stewart-Depute of Kirkcudbright, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

Watson and Ebenezer Stotts v. Sir Alexander Gordon — Answers, 6 Feb 1809 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders reject petitioners’ castle ownership claim, asserting their heritable keeper status under charter obligates them to preserve, not own, the castle.

William Ireland v. Watson, Ebenezer Stotts, and Thomas Goldie — Proof, 6 Mar 1801

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner Ireland seeks damages for destruction of Threave Castle by defendants Stotts and Goldie, supported by mason depositions detailing stone removal and structural damage.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 117
  • Page 118
  • Page 119
  • Page 120
  • Current page 121
  • Page 122
  • Page 123
  • Page 124
  • Page 125
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in