Rec. Note.—John Murray against Lord Corehouse's Interlocutor
Abstract
Court sustains objection to bond for £1500 as discharge to tutors, remits to accountant for further examination and interim decree consideration.
APPENDIX. No. I. LETTER—Mr Scoular to Mr Megger, dated 23d June 1819. Process, No. 5.
Abstract
Scoular disputes Megget’s claim of £186 toward his debt, asserting insufficient funds due to unpaid dividends and secured obligations.
Thomas Megget v. John Scoular — Revised Condescendence and Answers, 14 Nov 1832
Abstract
Pursuer claims defender owes balance from Jamaica debt, but defender denies obligation post-discharge and asserts pursuer acted as agent.
Thomas Megget v. John Scoular — Condescendence, 16 May 1816
Abstract
Megget, as partner in Aitken Megget & Co., claims against Scoular for unpaid debt from sequestration, disputing Scoular’s assertion that recovered Jamaica debt was to be applied to his claim.
Thomas Megget v. John Scoular — Reclaiming Petition, 7 Feb 1833
Abstract
Pursuer seeks recovery of advances and debt balance from defender, who denies obligation post-sequestration and claims prior composition extinguished all claims.
John Scoular v. Thomas Megget — Reclaiming Note, 28 Feb 1833
Abstract
John Scoolar, defender, seeks to reclaim a debt judgment against Thomas Megget, pursuer, asserting res judicata and that sums recovered from George Thomson were advanced to the defender.
No. IV. No. V. ACCEPTANCE of Reference. No. VI. AWARD of Referee.
Abstract
Referee appointed to assess and reduce debt from £31 10s. to £23 5s. after hearing parties and consulting professionals.
John G. Robertson v. Patrick Davidson — Minute, 20 Dec 1832
Abstract
Pursuer seeks payment of £31 10s for medical services rendered to Mrs Davidson, minus £3 already paid; defender offers arbitration or £10 additional, pursuer proposes referral to three Edinburgh surgeons.
Reclaiming Petition — Reclaiming Note, the Rev. Patrick Davidson against Lord Fullerton's Interlocutor
Abstract
Reclaiming Petition of Robert Thomson against the interlocutor of Lord Fullerton, praying that the Lords recall the interlocutors and remit to the Lord Ordinary to ascertain whether the judicial referee heard parties on all points remitted
Dugald Macintyre v. Alexander Mackenzie — 23 Apr 1833
Abstract
Complainer seeks loosing of arrestment on his weekly salary, claiming it is alimentary and insufficient to support him, while respondent argues debt remains unpaid and fund is arrestable.
