Dugald Macintyre v. Alexander Mackenzie — Reclaiming Note, 18 May 1833
Abstract
Dugald MacIntyre seeks to reclaim an interlocutor and have his arrestment loosed without consignation, claiming entitlement to expenses.
Archibald Gibson v. Pearson, Wilkie, and Robertson — Bill of Suspension
Abstract
Bill of Suspension by Archibald Gibson, trustee on the sequestrated estate of Messrs Wilson and Sons, asking the Court to suspend a charge against him for expenses incurred in managing the estate, which he claims were improperly paid to Messrs Stephenson & Co.
Archibald Gibson, Accountant in Edinburgh, Trustee on the Sequestrated Estate of Messrs Wilson & Sons, late IronMasters at Wilsontown; and William Wilson, Junior, and James Wilson, individual Partners of that Company,—Suspender ; in the Suspension At
Abstract
Reclaiming note challenging interlocutor in suspension bill against agents and assignees of East India Company merchant, asserting trustee liability for relief from constituents.
RECLAIMING NOTE ARCHIBALD GIBSON, Trustee on the Sequestrated Estate of Wilson & Sons, AGAINST Lord Cringletie's Interlocutor.
Abstract
Trustee seeks to recover costs from litigant, but Lord Ordinary denies the bill, holding trustee must fund own relief from constituents if estate funds are unavailable.
Colin Dunlop and Others v. Thomas Scott and William Scott — Reclaiming Note, 19 Jan 1833
Abstract
Defenders Thomas and William Scott contest liability for £200 bill and interest, denying joint obligation and claiming accommodation acceptances without value.
REVISED CONDESCENDENCE AND REVISED ANSWERS In causa, COLIN DUNLOP, Esq. of Tollcross, the Rev. Dr. JAMES M'LEAN, and Others, Trustees of the late ALEXANDER WADDELL, Esq. of Stonefi
Abstract
Pursuers, executors of deceased Alexander Waddell, claim ownership of two bills advanced to defenders in 1826, asserting testamentary confirmation and denial of defenders' partial renewals and payments.
Colin Dunlop of the Clyde Iron-Works, and Others, Trustees of the deceased Alexander Waddel of Stonefield v. Thomas Scott and William Scott — Answers, 10 Jun 1831
Abstract
Defenders assert they are not liable for bills due to pursuers, claiming accommodation acceptances and prior retirement of the first bill.
Colin Dunlop, Esq., of Tollcross, and Others, Trustees of the deceased Alexander Waddell of Stonefield v. Thomas Scott, Farmer at Townhead, and William Scott, Farmer at Adderston — Reclaiming Note, 3 Jan 1833
Abstract
Defender denies charges for correspondence with non-partner, asserting correspondence occurred despite absence in partner’s accounts.
No. 1. CORRESPONDENCE between the Parties. LETTER, Pursuer to Defender.
Abstract
Pursuer demands payment for legal services, citing unpaid balances and blocked collection; Defender denies liability and offers arbitration.
Alexander Pirie Henderson v. Michael Gilfillan — Appendix, 4 Apr 1833
Abstract
Pursuer seeks enforcement of execution for defender’s non-appearance at haver exam; case involves prior defamation litigation with contested compromise and reference attempts.
