Alexander P. Henderson v. Michael Gilfillan — Answers, 23 Nov 1832
Abstract
Defender denies pursuer's claims of oppression, delay, and breach of agreement regarding professional fees and case management.
RESPONDENT'S STATEMENT of FACTS, and Pursuer's ANSWERS thereto.; Pursuer's COUNTER STATEMENT of FACTS, and Defender's ANSWERS thereto.
Abstract
Pursuer claims unpaid expenses and profits from a dissolved partnership, while defender denies liability and asserts prior settlements and procedural delays.
Alexander Pirie Henderson v. Michael Gilfillan — Condescendence, 1832
Abstract
Pursuer claims unpaid legal fees for services rendered to defender across multiple lawsuits from 1823–1826, alleging delay and refusal to pay despite promised payment contingent on a verdict or award.
Reclaiming Petition — Alexander Pirie Henderson, Writer in Edinburgh,—Pursuer
Abstract
Pursuer seeks to overturn an interlocutor and recover unpaid legal fees from defender for services rendered in multiple protracted legal matters, including defamation, injunctions, and appeals, with deductions for prior payments and recovered expenses.
Reclaiming Note, a P. Henderson against Lord Mackenzie's Interlocutor
Abstract
Defender successfully defends against libel, pursuer ordered to pay defender's expenses with account to be taxed.
COPY INTERLOCUTORS IN FIRST BILL OF SUSPENSION, M'NAIR against LORD BLANTYRE. COPY INTERLOCUTOR IN THE PROCESS OF ADVOCATION, M'NAIR against LORD BLANTYRE.
Abstract
The pursuer's reclaiming petition is dismissed; expenses are awarded against them, and a second bill may be presented within six days.
John M’Nair v. Bill-Chamber Interlocutor — Appendix to Reclaiming Note, 3 Jul 1833
Abstract
Court directs reclaimer to print answer to first bill of suspension and respondent to box and print interlocutor in another case involving John M’Nair.
Tutors of Lord Blantyre v. John M'Nair — Duplies, 27 Jun 1832 [2]
Abstract
Defender challenges the competence and timing of the action of removing, arguing it violates procedural rules of the Act of Sederunt 1756 and lacks proper warning.
Lord Blantyre's Tutors v. John M'Nair — Replies, 5 Jun 1833
Abstract
Defender seeks to suspend interdict proceedings pending resolution of separate possession dispute over farm lease.
Tutors to the Right Honourable Lord Blantyre v. John M'Nair, Junior — Replies, 18 Apr 1832
Abstract
Respondent challenges removal for 1838 crop, claiming tacit relocation; petitioners rebut by showing one-year lease, explicit intent to quit, and acquiescence in farm management.
