Petition — W. & E. Stott against Lord Hermand's Interlocutor
Abstract
Petitioners seek review of Lord Hermand's interlocutor suspending Sir Alexander Gordon from intruding on Thrieve and transporting stones there.
Helen and Janet Shaws, William Young and John Strang v. John Shaw — Answers, 17 Sep 1807
Abstract
Answers by John Shaw of Corfehouse, Defender, to the petition of Helen and Janet Shaws, his Sisters, and of William Young and John Strang, their Husbands, for their Interests, Pursuers.
Shaw v. Shaw — Proof
Abstract
Defender John Shaw testifies to a prior discharge from his mother, Ann Strang, delivered before her testament; witnesses confirm her sound mind and capacity to sign.
Petition — Alexander Main for Liberation on Bail
Abstract
Petitioner seeks bail pending vacation while awaiting resolution of a failed cessio bonorum action and creditor objections tied to disputed correspondence.
APPENDIX. LETTER, ALEXANDER MAIN to Provost Young.
Abstract
Main claims debt from Young; Young counters by asserting Main owes him and is imprisoned at his suit; Jameson demands payment on behalf of creditors.
Alexander Main v. Provost William Young and Others — Answers, 2 Mar 1809
Abstract
Answers by the creditors of Alexander Main to the petition of the said Alexander Main
APPENDIX. No. I. LETTER—Mr ALEXANDER GAULD to ALEXANDER MAIN. No. II. LETTER—JAMES SMITH to ALEXANDER MAIN.
Abstract
Creditors push for settlement with debtor Alexander Main as financial strain mounts and debts remain contested.
Petition — Alexander Main, formerly Cattle-Dealer in Auchmull, present Prisoner in the Tolbooth of Edinburgh [2]
Abstract
Petitioner Alexander Main, a cattle-dealer, seeks relief from imprisonment and a cessio bonorum after being unable to pay creditors due to disputed claims and creditor harassment.
Andrew Livingstone v. Thomas Newall — Answers, 2 Mar 1809 [2]
Abstract
Answers by Thomas Newall in Edinghame to the condescendence for Andrew Livingstone of Airds, responding that the petitioner's allegations of fraud are unfounded and the creditor's composition is fair.
Andrew Livingstone v. Thomas Newall — Answers, 3 Feb 1809
Abstract
Respondent defends discharge after creditor petition challenging fairness of composition and lack of books.
