SCOS Archive | The University of Virginia Law Library

Abstract

Duncan Wright petitions for inspectors to assess his slating work at Whitelaw farm and enforce payment for completed portions.

Abstract

AI-generated

Answers by the pursuer to the statement of facts made by the defender, denying allegations regarding sub-contract, completion of work, and liability for expenses.

Abstract

AI-generated

Answers by Sir James Steuart and John Burns to the argument made by the pursuer, denying claims regarding contract completion, insolvency, and payment obligations under the condescendence.

Abstract

AI-generated

Pursuer claims unpaid slater work under sub-contract; defenders deny involvement and dispute work quality and payment obligations.

Abstract

AI-generated

Reclaiming Petition of Duncan Wright, Slater in Hamilton, against the interlocutor of Lord Moncreiff, seeking to alter the ruling and sustain reduction with expenses

Abstract

AI-generated

Court sustains defence, assoilzies defender Burns, finds expenses due, remits accounts to auditor for taxation.

Abstract

AI-generated

Defender denies payment demands were delayed until after summons; asserts property remains his and disputes interest payments and account validity.

Abstract

AI-generated

Pursuer, assignee of Campbell and Barlas, claims £345.19.5½ from defender for 1823 legal services against Dr Whyte, assigned via 1831 trustees’ disposition.

Abstract

AI-generated

Defender claims debt is prescribed and that expenses are shared with Barlas, thus no sum due; pursuer seeks decree for £345 19s 5½d plus interest and costs.

Abstract

AI-generated

Certificate of Colin Smith's child's birth and baptism in 1764, with witness attestations and minister's record.

Subscribe to

APPENDIX. 1.—MISSIVE of AGREEMENT between James Bennet and his Cautioners, and David Leighton, Factor for Sir James Steuart Denham.

STATEMENT of FACTS for John Burns, and ANSWERS thereto by the Pursuer.

Answer for Sir James Steuart. Admitted. Answer for John Burns. Admitted, under a reference to the judicial proceedings themselves. Answer for Sir James Steuart. Admitted. Answer fo

Duncan Wright v. Sir James Steuart Denham and John Burns — State of the Process, 21 Mar 1828

Duncan Wright v. John Burns and Sir James Steuart Denham — Reclaiming Petition, 7 Jun 1834

Duncan Wright v. John Burns and Sir James Steuart Denham — Reclaiming Note, 1834

COUNTER STATEMENT of FACTS for the Pursuer, and ANSWERS thereto for the DEFENDER.

Alexander Campbell v. Colin Arrott — Condescendence, 5 Mar 1834 [2]

Alexander Campbell v. Colin Arrott — Reclaiming Note, 8 Jan 1835

APPENDIX. I. CERTIFICATE of Mr Smith's Age. II. SUMMONS OF PROVING THE TENOR. (Apart.)