Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Isabella Howden or Crighton and Husband v. Robert and Gordon Howden — Memorial, 13 May 1814

Abstract
AI-generated
Memorial of Mrs Isabella Howden, or Crighton, and husband, arguing that the destruction of the trust deed revives the prior will and entitles her to administration as heir-at-law.

Petition — February 10, 1815. Pet.—Duke of Hamilton against Inner-House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of the Duke of Hamilton and Alexander, Marquis of Douglas, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

John Clark v. Archibald, Duke of Hamilton and Brandon and Alexander, Marquis of Douglas and Clydesdale — Answers, 6 Dec 1814

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents defend against petitioner’s claim to a servitude over a royal boundary wall, asserting the wall’s sovereign ownership and that any use is limited by prescription and charter boundaries.

Petition — J. & D. H. M'DOWALL & Co. against an Inner-House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of J. & D. H. M'Dowall & Co. asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

Young, Ross, Richardson, and Company v. James and Day Hort M'Dowall and Company — Answers, 12 Nov 1814

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by J. & D. H. M'Dowall & Co. to the minute of Young, Ross, Richardson & Co., arguing that the pursuers have failed to account for Dalby's bills and dividends drawn thereon.

Young, Ross, Richardson and Co. v. James and Day Hort M‘Dowall and Co. — Minute, 24 Jun 1814 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents seek to enforce a debt of £614 17s. from petitioners, who dispute the amount owed under a cognovit and claim reliance on bills from Dalby.

Young, Ross, Richardson and Company v. James and Day Hort M'Dowal junior and Company — Answers, 11 Jun 1814 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Messrs. Young, Ross, Richardson and Company, Calico Printers in Perth, to the petition of James and Day Hort M'Dowal junior and Company, Calico Printers in Glasgow, responding to the argument that arrestments are invalid.

Petition — J. & D. H. M'DOWAL & Co. against Lord Balmuto's Interlocutors

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of James and Day Hort M'Dowal Junior and Company, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

William Gordon v. The Rev. John Gairlies Maitland — Answers, 26 Nov 1814

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent defends sale of Auchinhay lands, disputing petitioner’s claims of fraud and misrepresentation in correspondence and agent status.

Reclaiming Petition — William Gordon against Inner-House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Reclaiming Petition of William Gordon, against inner-house interlocutor, arguing that the pursuer's claim is contrary to justice and that the interlocutor misinterprets the facts.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 87
  • Page 88
  • Page 89
  • Page 90
  • Current page 91
  • Page 92
  • Page 93
  • Page 94
  • Page 95
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in