Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Rev. Mr Maitland v. William Gordon — Petition, 13 Jun 1814

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of William Gordon, writer in Dumfries, asking the Court to overturn the inner-house interlocutor in the action against the Rev. Mr Maitland, minister of Minigaff.

Arend Mehrtens, Milne, Ogilvie, and Patison v. Richard Scougal and Company, Finlay and Bisset — Information, 7 Apr 1814

Abstract
AI-generated
Information of Arend Mehrtens and Mandatories, arguing that the vessel Der Friede was not abandoned after capture and recapture

Richard Scougall and Company v. Mehrtens — Appendix, 12 Nov 1812

Abstract
AI-generated
Richard Scougall and Company seek suspension of a decree against Mehrtens for expenses, arguing his misconduct caused cargo loss and wrongful detention.

Richard Scougall and Company v. Arend Mehrtens and Others — Information, 7 Apr 1814

Abstract
AI-generated
Information of Richard Scougall and Company, Merchants in Leith, arguing that the master of the Der Friede, Arend Mehrtens, is liable for loss incurred through his concealment of a French licence and subsequent capture of the vessel.

Duncan Wright v. Sir James Steuart Denham and John Burns — Memorial, 15 Jan 1835

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer seeks preference over Burns and Wilson for balance due on slater work, challenging sheriff’s judgment inconsistent with prior findings and expenses attributable to Burns’ actions.

ACCOUNT-CURRENT betwixt General Sir James STEUART DENHAM, Baronet, and JAMES BENNET, Carpenter at Rosebank, and JOHN BURNS, junior, of East Machan, and WILLIAM CADZOW, Mason at Ros

Abstract
AI-generated
Dispute over unpaid work/materials at Whiteshaw Farm Offices: contractor James Bennet, cautioners Burns and Cadzow, Steuart claims penalty for incomplete work.

Vol-282-164-175 unsorted seg095

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender seeks recovery of retained funds from arrestment, disputing inclusion of £30 paid to Burns as part of seized amount.

Sir James Stewart Denham v. Duncan Wright — Minute, 28 Jan 1835

Abstract
AI-generated
Court decrees against Sir James Stewart Denham for unpaid sums and expenses in a reduction process initiated by Duncan Wright, with John Burns also liable for process costs.

Duncan Wright v. General Sir James Steuart Denham — Condescendence, 16 Nov 1827

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender condescends to admit contract with Bennet, his bankruptcy, and subsequent engagement with Burns and Wilson to complete work, asserting only £16 10s 4½ due to them after expenses.

Duncan Wright v. James Bennet — Answers

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by James Bennet, Robert Wilson, and John Burns to the petition of Duncan Wright, asserting that the slate work was not defective and requesting inspection by skilled slaters.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 88
  • Page 89
  • Page 90
  • Page 91
  • Current page 92
  • Page 93
  • Page 94
  • Page 95
  • Page 96
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in