Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Alex. Watson v. Ann Watson and Others — Revised Case, 8 Jan 1835

Abstract
AI-generated
Court directs parties to prepare revised cases for review by succeeding Lord Ordinary or Court, emphasizing critical issues of propinquity and age evidence.

William Campbell v. James Young, Jeremiah Joyner and Robert Ross — Revised Case, 8 Feb 1834

Abstract
AI-generated
William Campbell challenges a summary suspension by Cromarty Justices for trading without a licence, arguing the petition was legally defective and the warrant ultra vires.

RECLAIMING NOTE FOR JAMES YOUNG, Esquire, Merchant in Cromarty, and JEREMIAH JOYNER and ROBERT ROSS, Esquires, Justices of the Peace for the County of Cromarty,

Abstract
AI-generated
Court finds warrant of imprisonment invalid for lacking statutory authority and ambiguous terms.

RECLAIMING NOTE, JAMES YOUNG AND OTHERS, AGAINST Lord Moncreiff's Interlocutor. Robert Roy, W.S., Chargers' Agent. Inglis and Donald, W.S., Suspender's Agents. Mr Thomson, Clerk.

Abstract
AI-generated
Court sustains jurisdiction over suspension case involving imprisonment without lawful warrant, reserves expenses question, and notes lack of specified trading locus in Cromarty.

Nisbet's Trustees against Nisbet & Others — Answers, 12 Feb 1835

Abstract
AI-generated
Claimants seek Lady Nisbett’s inheritance and annuity from Sir John Nisbett’s estate, disputing her foreign birth and prior alimony as disqualifying.

Nisbett's Trustees v. Nisbett — Revised Case, 15 May 1834

Abstract
AI-generated
Lady Nisbett, a South Carolina-born widow, claims her terce and jus relictae from her late husband Sir John Nisbett’s Scottish estate, disputing that a prior settlement of £2000 and annual alimony discharged only future support, not her legal inheritance rights.

Dame Maria Nisbett and Husband v. Sir John Nisbett's Trustees &c. — Complainers' Case, 15 May 1834

Abstract
AI-generated
Trustee appointment and estate disposition by Sir John Nisbett, 1813, contested by Lady Nisbett over her alienage claim to terce rights.

No. XXVIII. REVISED CONDESCENDENCE AND CLAIM for Misses Mary Speirs, Helen Speirs, and Joanna Isabella Speirs, of Polmont Park, Stirlingshire.

Abstract
AI-generated
Claimants, daughters of John Nisbett, seek reimbursement for enforcement costs of a bond secured by his life insurance, now recovered, and assert priority over trustees for those expenses.

No. XXVI. REVISED CONDESCENDENCE and CLAIM for John Rutherfurd, Esq. of Edgerston, the Right Honourable Charles Lord Sinclair, and Alexander Pringle, Esq. of Whytbank, Trustees and

Abstract
AI-generated
Trustees seek reimbursement for trust expenses including education, bond interest, and commissions, with claimants prioritized for recovery.

PLEAS IN LAW. No. XXV. REVISED CONDESCENDENCE AND CLAIM for HENRY CHARLES RUTHERFURD, Esq.

Abstract
AI-generated
Claimant as assignee of John Alexander Nisbett asserts residuary rights to estate of Dean under Sir John Nisbett’s settlements, while defendant objects and seeks to join multiplepoinding proceedings.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 93
  • Page 94
  • Page 95
  • Page 96
  • Current page 97
  • Page 98
  • Page 99
  • Page 100
  • Page 101
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in