Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Robert Gray and Son, Robertson, Reid, and Brother, James White and Son, and William Gray v. the Creditors of Alexander Greig Thomson — Petition and Complaint, 2 Dec 1820

Abstract
AI-generated
Dec 2, 1820: Robert Gray & Son petition to rescind creditors’ resolution accepting £300 from Cameron, Thomson & Co., claiming it favored self-interested minority and ignored estate’s best interest.

George Mercer v. Henry Leishman — Bill of Advocation, 1819

Abstract
AI-generated
George Mercer junior seeks indemnification for legal costs defending against Henry Leishman’s prosecution over a disputed promissory note, after multiple absolvitor judgments denied him costs.

Robert Hunter v. James Munn — Defences, 16 Jun 1818 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
June 16, 1818 Defences by James Munn, ship-builder in Greenock, against Robert Hunter, merchant in Greenock, asserting that the bills in question are mere renewals and he is already fully relieved of any obligation.

Robert Tennent and Others v. Thomas M'Intosh — Bill of Advocation, 20 Feb 1818

Abstract
AI-generated
June 2, 1818 Bill of Advocation of Robert Tennent and Others, owners of the steam-boat Glasgow, against Thomas M'Intosh, asking the Court to overturn interlocutors holding them liable for wages owed to a workman employed by Henry Bell, the engineer.

LC Volume 06 — Petition, 18 Feb 1818 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
February 18, 1818 Petition of G. Y. Shortridge asking the Court to alter Lord Cringletie's interlocutor on a bill of suspension

LC Volume 06 — Petition, 13 Jan 1818 [4]

Abstract
AI-generated
January 13, 1818 Petition of James Rentoul asking the Court to overturn Lord Gillies' interlocutor in a process of suspension against James Young

John Fleming v. James Brown — Answers, 10 Sep 1818 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
James Brown, Edinburgh accountant, replies Sept. 10, 1818, that a trustee isn’t liable for damages from a sale without power if no loss occurred and the sale was prudent and necessary.

John Fleming v. James Brown — Defences, 2 Feb 1816 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
February 2, 1816 Defences by James Brown, Accountant, against the Reverend John Fleming, asserting his conduct as trustee was lawful and his accounting practices proper under the 1793 Bankrupt Act.

John Fleming v. James Brown — Summons, 16 Dec 1815 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
December 16, 1815 Summons of the Reverend John Fleming against James Brown, accountant in Edinburgh, for breach of trust in sale of heritable lands.

LC Volume 06 — Reclaiming Petition, 8 Jul 1818 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
July 8, 1818 Reclaiming Petition of the Rev. John Fleming, against Lord Pitmilly's interlocutor

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 93
  • Page 94
  • Page 95
  • Page 96
  • Current page 97
  • Page 98
  • Page 99
  • Page 100
  • Page 101
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in