Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

John Thomson, Gibson, and Company v. William William Baxter and Thomas Baxter — Appendix

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers claim debt of 129l. 6d. from two defenders over unpaid wheat sales, with defenders denying liability for Thomas Baxter’s debt.

Petition — William William Baxter against Lord Alloway's Interlocutors

Abstract
AI-generated
William Baxter contests interlocutors holding him liable for his brother’s debt, asserting he never agreed to guarantee it despite correspondence that does not establish personal obligation.

Finlay, Duff, and Company v. James Hamilton Sen. and Company — Answers, 8 Sep 1814

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents defend against petitioners' claim to funds from consigned cotton, asserting the goods were shipped for Grant’s benefit, not M'Kenzie and Bennoch’s, and petitioners have no title to dispute respondents’ preference.

APPENDIX. CORRESPONDENCE produced for James Hamilton senior and Company---Charges.

Abstract
AI-generated
Hamilton Senior & Co. claim ownership of cotton consigned by Johnston for Grant, now disputed by Grant’s assignees and creditors with liens.

Petition — Findlay, Duff & Co. against Lord Craigie's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of Messrs Findlay, Duff, & Co. asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

Duncan Campbell v. Malcolm Munro — Answers, 6 Apr 1815

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent denies liability as partner or joint adventurer in cattle sale; argues promise to pay is unenforceable without written contract.

Petition — Duncan Campbell, Esq against Inner-House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of Duncan Campbell asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

Duncan Campbell v. Malcolm Monro — Answers, 8 Sep 1814

Abstract
AI-generated
Malcolm Monro denies involvement in Duncan Campbell’s 1811 cattle sale, rejecting partnership claims and oral promise enforceability under Scots law.

Duncan Campbell v. John and Malcolm Munro — Condescendence

Abstract
AI-generated
Defendant Malcolm Munro denies liability as joint purchaser and denies being bound as cautioner for his brother, challenging the pursuer’s claim for payment of cattle price.

Duncan Campbell v. Malcolm Munro — Answers, 21 Sep 1811 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender denies joint liability in cattle sale, citing no knowledge, authorization, or payment.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 84
  • Page 85
  • Page 86
  • Page 87
  • Current page 88
  • Page 89
  • Page 90
  • Page 91
  • Page 92
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in