SCOS Archive | The University of Virginia Law Library

Abstract

Pursuer claims defender must reimburse legal expenses incurred by solicitor representing deceased brother in entailed estate litigation, despite defender not being his representative.

Abstract

AI-generated

Pursuer seeks debt for legal services to defender’s deceased brother; court dismisses claim, ruling heir not liable for predecessor’s personal debts under entail.

Abstract

AI-generated

Pursuer seeks to re-revise his condescendence and defenders respond to revised answers in water supply dispute over pipes and reservoir construction.

Abstract

AI-generated

Defenders argue the pursuer’s action is groundless, as pipes were properly installed, water supply adequate, and contract fully performed with payments made.

Abstract

AI-generated

Pursuer sues plumbers for defective water pipes causing inadequate supply and damages.

Abstract

AI-generated

Pursuer seeks trial on relevancy of averments against plumbers for defective water pipes causing prolonged supply failure.

Abstract

AI-generated

Defenders reclaim interlocutor finding them liable for only two guineas in expenses due to incorrect summons form, requesting full expense recovery and interim decree under judicature act §6.

Abstract

AI-generated

Respondent owns shop and sunk storey in Elm Row tenement; suspenders claim he breaches stair maintenance obligations and uses premises in nuisance way.

Abstract

AI-generated

Robert Saunders defends his right to the common stair via title-deeds, citing a sunk floor in his feu-charter and an attested upkeep account.

Abstract

AI-generated

Complainers object to Robert Saunders converting sunk storey into dwellings and using common stair, claiming breach of feu-contract and nuisance.

Subscribe to

Alexander Fraser and John Black Gracie v. Lieutenant Colonel Vans Agnew of Sheuchan — Appendix, 8 Jan 1829

Alexander Fraser and John Black Gracie v. Lieutenant Colonel Patrick Vans Agnew — Reclaiming Note, 24 Nov 1829

William Macdonald v. Messrs Mackie & Co. — Condescendence, 6 Feb 1829

William M'Donald v. Messrs. Mackie and Company — Answers, 6 Feb 1829

William Macdonald v. Mackie and Company — Summons, 14 Mar 1828

William Macdonald v. Messrs Mackie & Co. — Revised Case, 26 May 1829

James Hill, Peter Fyffe, Roderick Harris, James Luke, James Pullar, Junior, Alexander Patullo, Thomas Small, John Beattie, James Watson, and George Moir, all Bakers in Dundee

James Anderson, Alexander Fiddes and Alexander Cuninghame v. Robert Saunders — Condescendence

James Anderson v. Robert Saunders — Answers, 3 Jun 1829

No. I. LETTERS of SUSPENSION, JAMES ANDERSON and OTHERS, AGAINST ROBERT SAUNDERS.