Janet Mills v. James Hamilton — Note, 2 Apr 1829
Abstract
Court finds pursuer has valid title to debt, rejects defender's trust-deed defense, and orders expenses with account to be taxed.
William Jaffray, Junior v. William Lindsay and James Craig — Answers, 22 Jun 1827
Abstract
Respondents William Lindsay and James Craig answer advocator William Jaffray’s reasons, disputing stamp duty applicability, proof of disbursement, and the validity of an oath of calumny.
William Jaffray v. William Lindsay and James Craig — Condescendence, 17 May 1828
Abstract
Advocator claims £359 paid by Lindsay and Craig for bankruptcy administration, but asserts only £150 from Lindsay; respondents deny this, insisting full sum was jointly paid.
William Lindsay and James Craig v. William Jaffray, Junior — Answers, 22 Jun 1827
Abstract
Answers by William Lindsay and James Craig to the reasons of advocation for William Jaffray, Junior, asserting that the document in question is not a receipt for debt discharge and the advocator has not proven payments made.
William Jaffray, Junior v. William Lindsay and James Craig — Reclaiming Note, 11 Jun 1829 [2]
Abstract
Advocator seeks to reclaim a libel based on an un-stamped acknowledgment, arguing it's invalid under stamp laws and that pursuer's oath admits partial payment.
Magnus Jamieson v. Magnus Henderson — State of the Process
Abstract
Jamieson seeks £1,000 damages for reputational harm from false claims by Henderson, citing witness depositions and anonymous letters, while pressing for prompt service despite delays.
David Clyne v. Andrew Snody — 3 Sep 1829
Abstract
Court repels defender's defense, finds him liable for pursuer's expenses, and orders accounting and audit.
David Clyne v. Andrew Snody — State of the Process, 27 May 1828
Abstract
David Clyne sues Andrew Snody for unpaid legal fees from multiple 1820s processes, including cessio bonorum and admiralty actions, with Snody denying responsibility and claiming payments or charitable motives.
David Clyne v. Andrew Snody — 19 Apr 1827
Abstract
David Clyne sues Andrew Snody for unpaid legal fees from cases managed under Snody’s informal recommendation, with Snody denying employment and asserting prescription and lack of attorney license.
David Clyne v. Andrew Snody — Reclaiming Note, 18 Jun 1829
Abstract
Defender appeals interlocutor rejecting their defense and ordering expenses against them in a reclaiming note.
