SCOS Archive | The University of Virginia Law Library

Abstract

Robert Saunders seeks to reclaim a note against Lord Medwyn’s interlocutor, with suspender’s agents and respondent’s agent appearing.

Abstract

AI-generated

Court remits accounts for taxation to auditor, grants diligence warrants and court commissions to recover documents and process records related to advocator’s father’s legal proceedings.

Abstract

AI-generated

David Chrystie seeks to reclaim an interlocutor against John Douglas, requesting the Court of Session review and remit to the Lord Ordinary’s prior decision of June 1829.

Abstract

AI-generated

Pursuer paid funeral costs for Mrs Brown, including clergy and cooper fees, with receipts held by Rev. Graham Mitchell until after the funeral.

Abstract

AI-generated

Respondents oppose Cessio Bonorum seeking to release pursuer from debts, alleging fraudulent misapplication of deceased aunt’s estate.

Abstract

AI-generated

Pursuer seeks to discharge debts incurred before inheriting legacy from aunt, arguing funds were used for family and medical needs, leaving surplus.

Abstract

AI-generated

Respondent denies pursuer's claim for teinds 1822-1825, asserting prior judicial reference and settlement extinguished all claims.

Abstract

AI-generated

Court rejects preliminary defense on competency, grants diligence to recover arbitral proceedings, and assigns deposition to advocate.

Abstract

AI-generated

Mrs Zelica Cheshire, alias Wallace, and her curator seek to reclaim an interlocutor from Lord Meadowbank, requesting the court find her entitled to expenses.

Abstract

AI-generated

Mrs. Janet Mills, executrix of Alexander Henderson, sues James Hamilton for £497.11s. on a disputed bill from Eagle and Henderson, denying validity and improper debt accumulation.

Subscribe to

Feb. 6, 1830. Reclaiming Note, Robert Saunders against Lord Medwyn's Interlocutor

APPENDIX. No. I. INTERLOCUTORS of the Lord Ordinary in Causa. Act. D. McNeill.—Alt. Solicitor-General. Act. D. McNeill.—Alt. Solicitor-General.

David Chrystie v. John Douglas — Reclaiming Note, 5 Jan 1830 [2]

APPENDIX. No. I. Note of Sums paid by Pursuer for behoof of Mrs Brown, Whitburn. No. II. LETTER, by the Rev. Graham Mitchell of the Parish of Whitburn, to John Adams, S. S. C.

William Mitchell v. James Mitchell, Isobel Brown or Macleod, and Mary Brown — Answers, 9 Jul 1829

REVISED CONDESCENDENCE FOR WILLIAM MITCHELL, formerly Mason, Water of Leith, at present a Prisoner in the Calton Jail, Edinburgh. IN THE PROCESS of CESSIO BONORUM at his Instance a

Wallace v. Duke of Portland — Answers, 10 Jun 1829

Mrs Zelica Cheshire, alias Wallace v. His Grace the Duke of Portland — Appendix

Mrs Zelica Cheshire, alias Wallace v. His Grace the Duke of Portland — Reclaiming Note, 4 Dec 1829

Janet Mills v. James Hamilton — Record, 29 Jan 1829