Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Mrs Sarah Gardner or Johnstone or Macmillan and Basil Macmillan v. Andrew Stevenson — Reclaiming Note, 5 Jan 1830

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers seek to alter an interlocutor denying expenses; respondent opposes; court reserves expense issues for inferior court.

Andrew Stevenson v. Sarah Gardner — Duplies, 10 Jul 1827 [3]

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender Sarah Gardner defends against claim of vitious intromission, asserting she merely managed her late husband’s trifling estate to pay privileged debts and did not unlawfully dispose of property.

Andrew Stevenson v. Sarah Gardner — Replies, 19 Jun 1827

Abstract
AI-generated
Replies by Andrew Stevenson, Farmer in Barclay, to Defences for Sarah Gardner of Johnston, in NewtonStewart, Relict of Charles Johnston, Innkeeper there, asserting that the defender vitiously intromitted her husband's property and is liable in payment of his debts.

Sarah Gardner and Basil Macmillan v. Andrew Stevenson — Bill of Advocation, 27 Feb 1829

Abstract
AI-generated
Court closes record of debt action; parties to debate on additional pleas, with reserved objection to certified testament.

Andrew Stevenson v. Sarah Gardner, or Johnston, or Macmillan — Reclaiming Note, 18 Dec 1829

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent seeks to alter interlocutor and remit case to Sheriff, or allow further proof of vitious intromission by advocates, with costs.

Robert Falkner v. John Davidson — Report, 10 Mar 1828

Abstract
AI-generated
Falkner suspends letters against Davidson, disputing benefit from charger’s services on Henderson’s debt, reserving right to challenge taxation method.

No. III. AMENDED ANSWERS for John Davidson, Writer, Edinburgh,—Charger.

Abstract
AI-generated
Charger seeks payment for recovering debts on trust-estate, denying unauthorized employment and disputing suspension grounds.

Reclaiming Note, John Davidson,—Respondent against Lord Cringletie's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent seeks to reclaim funds from a trustee’s agent who allegedly acted without authority, retained excess funds, and pursued debts improperly.

APPENDIX. No. I. Mr F. Hamilton, W. S. to Mr J. Whitehead, S.S.C. No. II. The Same to the Same.

Abstract
AI-generated
Mr Hamilton advises Mr Whitehead that Mr Urquhart seeks £500 security to discharge an inhibition against Mr Cox, deeming £200 insufficient, and proposes discussion to avoid court intervention.

Isaac Harris Clerk Cox and Mrs Eliza Lamb or Cox v. Thomas Urquhart — Answers, 22 Feb 1830

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Thomas Urquhart to the petition of Isaac Harris Clerk Cox and Mrs Eliza Lamb or Cox, responding to allegations of assault and slander.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 455
  • Page 456
  • Page 457
  • Page 458
  • Current page 459
  • Page 460
  • Page 461
  • Page 462
  • Page 463
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in