George Rodgers v. Thomas Harvie — Report, 14 Nov 1829
Abstract
Surveyor recommends six-foot-wide elevated footpath along riverbank to resolve access dispute, noting defender’s cooperation.
George Rodgers v. Thomas Harvie — Answers, 12 Jan 1830 [2]
Abstract
Answers by Thomas Harvie of Westthorn to the Note presented by George Rodgers, Barrowfield Dye-works, and others, asserting the Note was presented in breach of mutual understanding and its requirements are unreasonable.
George Rodgers and Others v. Thomas Harvie — Note, 17 Dec 1829
Abstract
Pursuers seek to enforce a public footpath along riverbank, challenging defender’s obstruction and requesting path maintenance and repair obligations.
John Kirkland and John Ferguson Sharpe v. James Bristow Fraser — Reclaiming Note, 4 Sep 1828
Abstract
Pursuers failed to produce title, action dismissed; defender seeks recovery of expenses incurred resisting diligence extension.
William Fell v. William Baird and James Houston Maxwell — Answers, 5 Dec 1829
Abstract
Chargers seek suspension of William Fell’s judicial examination and judgment without caution, citing his fraudulent evasion and their obligation to relieve them from bond forfeiture.
Petition — Thomas Mansfield, Esq
Abstract
Petitioner seeks commission to examine debtor abroad; another petitioner seeks suspension of sheriff’s decree against a complainer who was not notified of bond forfeiture proceedings.
Miss Margaret Grant v. Alexander Baillie — Productions, 3 Sep 1829
Abstract
Defender seeks to remit case to Second Division, claiming prior proceedings there; pursuer opposes, asserting no valid dependence and that Second Division never reviewed his condescendence.
DEFENDER'S STATEMENT OF FACTS, AND PURSUER'S ANSWERS THERETO.
Abstract
State of the Process of the defender, denying the pursuer's construction of facts and asserting his refusal to settle the debt under any arrangement
Margaret Grant v. Alexander Baillie — Condescendence
Abstract
Pursuer claims loan of £41 10s. to defender’s daughter was made with defender’s consent and used for family necessities; defender denies involvement, claims secret transaction and denies debt obligation.
James Saunders and John Galletly v. David Hunter — Answers, 5 Feb 1829
Abstract
Answers by David Hunter, Esquire, of Blackness, to the reasons of advocacy for James Saunders and John Galletly, Writers in Dundee, asserting the interlocutor should be adhered to and the defender assoilzied.
