Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Peter Taylor Young v. Alexander Baillie — State of the Process, 18 Dec 1829

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer claims debt from defender via indorsed accounts and cash advances, seeking payment of £140+ interest; defender defends on grounds of prior verbal settlement and disputed account items.

Peter Taylor Young v. Alexander Baillie — Reclaiming Note, 11 Jan 1830

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender Alexander Baillie ordered to pay pursuer Peter Taylor Young the taxed sums from three business accounts plus cash advances, minus prior recovery and disputed amounts, with interest and process costs.

James Henderson v. John Rowat — Condescendence [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender seeks payment for goods and services rendered to pursuer’s father, with revised condescendence and answers filed for procedural review.

James Henderson v. John Rowat — Reclaiming Note, 5 Jan 1830 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer seeks payment of debts from defender, who claims counterclaims and requests inspection of late Mr Henderson’s books to settle accounts.

Dame Anne Preston Campbell or Baird and Others v. Thomas Lord Lynedoch — Answers, 19 Jan 1830

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender defends against pursuers’ claim that his 1807 land disposition misstated stipend burden, causing them financial loss due to unaccounted 1807 augmentation.

Sir David Baird v. Thomas, Lord Lynedoch — Reclaiming Note

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer seeks to reclaim land sale proceeds based on alleged misrepresentation of stipend obligations, challenging defender’s claim that apportionment was limited to existing burdens.

Sir David Baird v. Thomas, Lord Lynedoch — Reclaiming Note, 25 Jun 1828

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer seeks expenses against Defender over 1807 land sale where minister’s stipend augmentation was omitted from teinds, but Lord Ordinary finds no valid claim as no offer or demand existed and pursuer cannot now assert rights.

Thomas Stevenson and Company v. Maxwell and Company — Respondents' Case, 6 Feb 1830

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents claim bonded oats stay legally theirs until customs records statutory transfer, despite sale to Rennie and delivery to his agents.

PLEAS IN LAW. ADDITIONS to the REPLIES for THOMAS STEVENSON and COMPANY.

Abstract
AI-generated
Replies by the pursuers, asserting that the defenders have no right to claim delivery of the oats, and that the property remains subject to stoppage in transitu until payment is secured.

Thomas Stevenson & Co. v. Messrs Maxwell & Co., Robert M'Nair, James Ure, and Michael Russel — Replies, 1 Sep 1829

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers claim right to stop oats in transitu until price paid, challenging defenders' agency status and statutory transfer requirements.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 451
  • Page 452
  • Page 453
  • Page 454
  • Current page 455
  • Page 456
  • Page 457
  • Page 458
  • Page 459
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in