George Park v. James Arnot — Answers, 25 Jun 1761
Abstract
Respondent denies contract of sale for barley, asserting delivery was for malted use only, not purchase, and receipt was a voucher, not acceptance of sale.
Petition — poor Angus Macdonell, Son of the deceased Ronald Macdonell of Shian, and William Macdonald Writer in Edinburgh, his Tutor-dative
Abstract
Petition of Angus Macdonell, Son of the deceased Ronald Macdonell of Shian, asking the Court to permit recovery of a tack granted by Killibuntly to Robert Macpherson, and to authorize transmission of prior oath and declaration from another process.
Reclaiming Petition — George Park Tenant in Windy-Mains
Abstract
Reclaiming Petition of George Park, asking the Court to alter the interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary which absolved the defender from liability for the price of bear delivered for malting.
Archibald Trotter v. Andrew Cochran, John Murdoch, and Company — Information, 5 Feb 1760 [2]
Abstract
Information of Archibald Trotter, Merchant in Glasgow, arguing that the defenders unlawfully delayed payment of his bank notes and prescribed unlawful hours for payment
George Dundas of Dundas v. Thomas Dundas of Fingask and Thomas Dundas of Quarole — Information, 16 Jan 1759
Abstract
Information of Thomas Dundas of Fingask, Esq; and Thomas Dundas of Quarole, his eldest Son, Defenders, arguing that they have lawful title to their matriculated coat-armorial, distinct from the pursuer's claim.
George Dundas of Dundas v. Thomas Dundas, elder and younger, of Fingask — Information, 11 Jan 1759
Abstract
Information of George Dundas of Dundas, Esq, arguing that the Defenders unjustly assumed and registered the Arms of Dundas as his lineal heirs, and requesting their erasure from the Lyon Books.
George Dundas of Dundas v. Thomas Dundas, elder and younger, of Fingask — Information, 11 Jan 1759 [2]
Abstract
Information of Archibald Trotter, arguing that the defenders have repeatedly refused to pay his notes in Edinburgh Notes or Specie, and that he will demand payment in such form or face public exposure of his time spent securing payment.
Trustees of the deceased Dr James Robertson Barclay v. Mrs Ann Mary Robertson, or Griffiths, and Others — Revised Condescendence and Claim, 14 Nov 1829
Abstract
Nieces of deceased trustee claim £3000 trust surplus, disputing trustees’ view that 1825 missive letter didn’t revoke land-purchase clause.
The Trustees of Dr J. R. Barclay v. G. R. Barclay — Summons, 28 May 1829
Abstract
Trustees of deceased Dr J. R. Barclay sue heirs over £3000 estate surplus, seeking court ruling on its allocation per 1822 deed and 1824–25 letters.
Reclaiming Note, G. R. BARCLAY, Esq. and OTHERS, against Lord Corehouse's Interlocutor. RECLAIMING NOTE
Abstract
Claimants seek allocation of fund in medio for nieces per testator's 1825 instruction reserving property; petition to overturn Lord Corehouse's interlocutor.
