SCOS Archive | The University of Virginia Law Library

Abstract

Answers by George Rea of Newton to the reclaiming petition of Walter Millar, asserting that the pursuer was not entitled to commence business or make claims under the contract.

Abstract

AI-generated

Walter Millar seeks to reclaim property against James Little, executor of George Rea, via respondent's appendix to reclaiming note.

Abstract

AI-generated

Walter Miller seeks to constitute a debt independently of two disputed bills, challenging an interlocutor that permits this shift in grounds.

Abstract

AI-generated

Pursuer proves receipt of two bills via agent Smyth, who attests to signing and delivery; defender denies possession, agents search but find no receipts.

Abstract

AI-generated

Court upholds claim based on delivery of bills as authentic obligations, rejecting defense that they are unsigned and not his.

Abstract

AI-generated

Defender challenges inept summons and denies owing pursuer any sum, asserting he is owed £12,000+ and is under cautionary obligation.

Abstract

AI-generated

Defender James John Fraser seeks review of judgment rejecting his preliminary defences and is ordered to pay expenses pending appeal.

Abstract

AI-generated

Defenders challenge action’s competency, citing statutory review limits and 21-day appeal deadline for Sheriff’s land takings judgment under quay acts.

Abstract

AI-generated

Pursuers seek reduction of Sheriff’s judgment and damages against defenders claiming title to Clyde Street waterfront land.

Abstract

AI-generated

Pursuers challenge Sheriff’s land title judgment, claiming statutory review was not followed and common law remedies remain available.

Subscribe to

George Rea of Newton v. Walter Millar, sometime of Langriggs, now of Springfield — Answers, 19 Nov 1825

Respondent's Appendix to Rec. Note—Walter Millar against Lord Fullerton's Interlocutor

Walter Miller v. James Little — Additional Appendix to Reclaiming Note, 3 Jul 1830

George Rae v. Walter Miller — Proof, 24 Feb 1817

Walter Miller v. James Little — Reclaiming Note, 1 Jul 1830 [2]

Lieutenant-Colonel John Gordon of Cluny v. James John Fraser — Defences, 1 Dec 1830

John Gordon v. James John Fraser — Reclaiming Note, 11 Jan 1831

John Wright and Others v. Walter Logan, J. M. Logan and William Carrick — Minute, 19 Jan 1831

Wright and Others v. Logans, &c. — Summons, 24 Dec 1829

John Wright and Others v. Walter Logan, Esq. of Fingleton, John Maxwell Logan, Esq. Younger of Fingleton, and William Carrick, Accountant in Glasgow — Minute, 25 Jun 1830