George Alston v. Patrick M'Beth — Account, 1829
Abstract
Suspender’s expense account for legal docs, correspondence, and procedural actions in George Alston’s suspension of Patrick M'Beth.
George Alston v. Patrick M'Beth — Reclaiming Note, 13 Jan 1831
Abstract
John Reid seeks to reclaim and have his defenses sustained against Peter Lyon’s original and supplementary actions, requesting expenses and a revision of an interlocutor dated December 1830.
(SUPPLEMENTARY ACTION.)
Abstract
Heir seeks lease redemption; defender claims £1217:19:7 plus interest for advances, counters with expenses, court awards redemption but denies expenses.
Reclaiming Petition — Reclaiming Note. John Reid against Lord Corehouse's Interlocutor
Abstract
Pursuer seeks reclaiming against Lord Corehouse's interlocutor; court orders condescendences, revised pleadings, and record closure.
George Johnston Junior v. John Clark — Reclaiming Note, 2 Sep 1830
Abstract
Pursuer claims delay and underpayment in construction; defender seeks to repel claims and defend against interim decree.
George Johnston v. John Clark — State of the Process, 19 Dec 1828
Abstract
Defender claims damages for delays and extra costs in construction; pursuer counters that delays were caused by defender’s actions and disputes valuation of work.
George Johnston junior v. John Clark — Reclaiming Petition, 2 Sep 1830
Abstract
Reclaiming Petition of John Clark, Architect in Edinburgh, asking the Court to alter the interlocutor which decerns against him ad interim for L. 100 to account
Alexander Oliphant Murray v. James Scott — Revised Case, 19 May 1829
Abstract
Murray sues over wood rights on entailed estates, disputing trustee’s authority to cut trees sold during predecessor’s lifetime.
APPENDIX. REVISED REASONS of SUSPENSION and INTERDICT for The Honourable Alexander Oliphant Murray, and his Commissioners; and REVISED ANSWERS thereto for James Scott, Esq.
Abstract
Complainer seeks to preserve timber on entailed estates; respondent denies motive and scope of Miss Ferguson’s interventions.
Alexander Oliphant Murray v. James Scott — Answers, 12 Jun 1828
Abstract
Respondent, trustee for creditors, defends against suspension and interdict seeking to bar wood-cutting on entailed estates, asserting superior feudal title under 1824 trust conveyance.
