Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Petition — John Campbell senior, & Co. against Inner-House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of John Campbell senior and Company, Merchants in Glasgow, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

Petition — J. Campbell, sen. & Co. against Lord Hermand's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of John Campbell, senior, & Co. asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

Robert Forrester v. Howdon, Sanderson & Co. — Information, 1 Apr 1802

Abstract
AI-generated
Information of Robert Forrester, Esq., arguing that the bill in question was an accommodation-bill and that the suspenders cannot avoid payment because one of their partners was the holder.

APPENDIX. No. I. TACK betwixt JAMES WHITEFOORD of Dunduff and WILLIAM GRIEVE.

Abstract
AI-generated
James Whitefoord leases lands at Barlaugh and Harkerstoun to William Grieve for 38 years or until Grieve’s heir inherits, with rent, enclosure duties, and maintenance obligations.

E. of Galloway vs. Mr. Mitchelson — Information, 18 Jan 1803

Abstract
AI-generated
Creditors meeting approves Alexander M'Hutcheon’s proposal to transfer Hugh M'Hutcheon’s estate to trustees for sale to repay debts.

The Right Honourable John Earl of Galloway v. Alexander M‘Hutcheon — Memorial, 30 Dec 1802

Abstract
AI-generated
Alexander M‘Hutcheon claims possession via heir cum beneficio inventarii, asserting the lease’s exclusion of assignees doesn’t bar him.

Howden, Sanderson, and Company v. Robert Forrester — Information, 29 May 1802

Abstract
AI-generated
Information of the Company Howden, Sanderson & Co., arguing that as drawers of a bill bearing value, they are entitled to the plea of undue negotiation due to lack of protest and notice.

Whiteheads and Howard v. Archibald Campbell — Answers, 2 Dec 1802

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents, as onerous indorsees, seek payment from petitioner after note dishonored via chain of blank indorsements.

APPENDIX. No. I. Copy from the EXTRACT REGISTERED PROTEST, No. 2. in Process.

Abstract
AI-generated
Protest of £1550 promissory note due Dec 1, 1801, after refusal to pay due to unmarketable wine in royal warehouse.

Petition — Arch. Campbell, Esq. against Lord Hermand's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner challenges a court ruling that bankers Whiteheads and Howard are onerous holders of a protested bill for bad wine, arguing they are trustees holding it for original venders.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 428
  • Page 429
  • Page 430
  • Page 431
  • Current page 432
  • Page 433
  • Page 434
  • Page 435
  • Page 436
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in