Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

William Rose v. James Earl of Fife — Answers, 12 Nov 1802 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by the Earl of Fife to the petition of William Rose, responding that the petitioner's claim is extinguished by annual settlements and payments made in full.

Add. Pet.—William Rose against Inner-House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
William Rose seeks unpaid professional services beyond his factor role, challenging an interlocutor’s denial of annuity and extra remuneration claims.

William Rose v. James Earl of Fife — Answers, 5 Mar 1802 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Earl of Fife opposes William Rose’s petition for diligence to recover documents, arguing Rose failed to specify particular items and that such a request is too general or irrelevant given Rose’s access.

Reclaiming Petition — William Rose against Inner-House Interlocutor [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
William Rose petitions to reclaim an interlocutor denying compensation for professional services rendered to Earl of Fife beyond his factor salary.

APPENDIX TO THE ANSWERS for James Earl of Fife. No. I. State of Accounts between the EARL of FIFE and Mr ROSE, anno 1785.

Abstract
AI-generated
Accounts of charges and discharges between Earl of Fife and his factor William Rose for estate management, rents, fees, and expenses from 1784 to 1786.

APPENDIX TO THE PETITION for Mr. WILLIAM ROSE. No. I. COMMISSION and FACTORY for the Duff-House Estate, the EARL of FIFE to Mr. WILLIAM ROSE, dated 8th December 1764.

Abstract
AI-generated
Commission appointing William Rose as factor and baron bailie for Earl of Fife’s estates in Aberdeen, Banff, and Elgin, with power to collect rents, manage tenants, and settle accounts.

Petition — William Rose, Esq. against Lord Cullen's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
William Rose seeks payment for decades of unpaid services as factor, conveyancer, and agent to Lord Fife, managing estates and inheritances, with Lord Fife’s own acknowledgments cited as evidence.

Petition — William Rose, Esq. late Factor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of William Rose, Esq. asking the Court to remit the interlocutor against him for services rendered as factor and conveyancer to the Earl of Fife

William Orr Younger v. John Orr, William Orr, and Thomas Whitehead — Answers, 6 Mar 1801

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Messrs. John and William Orrs Manufacturers in Paisley, and Thomas Whitehead Tanner there, to the petition of William Orr Younger, eldest lawful son of the late Robert Orr Manufacturer in Paisley.

Petition — William Orr against Lord Hermand's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner seeks legacy payment, interest, and debt from uncle, alleging trustees misused powers and unjustly retained his property.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 430
  • Page 431
  • Page 432
  • Page 433
  • Current page 434
  • Page 435
  • Page 436
  • Page 437
  • Page 438
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in