Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Michael Gilfillan and Mrs Mary Bogle v. John Burnet — Duplies, 2 Oct 1823 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent denies all allegations as false and abandoned, requesting dismissal with costs.

Michael Gilfillan and Mary Bogle v. William Goodwin — Duplies, 2 Oct 1823

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent denies circulating slanderous summons, claims no connection to complainers, and asserts the petition was improperly used to defame him.

DUPLIES, Alex. Ure, TO THE REP.—M. Gilfillan and Spouse. William Guthrie, Respondent's Agent. A. P. Henderson, Petitioners' Agent. Mr Hamilton, Clerk. DUPLIES FOR ALEXANDER URE, Wr

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent denies distributing a summons or conspiring in its spread, rejects ties to named individuals, and demands jury trial.

Michael Gilfillan and Mrs Mary Bogle v. William Guthrie — Duplies, 2 Oct 1823

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent denies malicious libel and excessive printing claims, calling them baseless, contradictory, and unsupported by evidence.

Replies — Replies Mr & Mrs Gilfillan, to Ans.—For William Guthrie, W. E. & Others. Replies for Michael Gilfillan of Westermains, Writer in Glasgow, and Mrs Mary Bogle, his Spouse,—Complainers, to the Answers for William Guthrie, Writer in Edinburgh…

Abstract
AI-generated
Complainers seek interdict and costs against five respondents for malicious, extrajudicial circulation of a defamatory summons.

Michael Gilfillan and Mrs. Mary Bogle, otherwise Gilfillan v. Peter Adam — Answers, 4 Jul 1823

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent denies all allegations against him, asserting they are abandoned or contradicted in replies, and requests dismissal with costs.

Michael Gilfillan and Mrs Mary Bogle v. William Goodwin — Answers, 8 Jul 1823

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by William Goodwin to the petition and complaint of Michael Gilfillan and Mrs Mary Bogle, asserting that he had no motive or intent to disseminate the summons and was merely shown it accidentally by a clerk.

Michael Gilfillan and Mrs Mary Bogle, otherwise Gilfillan v. John Burnet — Answers, 7 Jul 1823

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by John Burnet to the petition and complaint of Michael Gilfillan and Mrs Mary Bogle, asserting that he was not responsible for disseminating the summons and denying the allegations of malice.

Michael Gilfillan and Mrs Mary Bogle or Gilfillan v. Alexander Ure — Answers, 8 Jul 1823

Abstract
AI-generated
Alexander Ure denies maliciously circulating a libel against Michael Gilfillan and his wife, asserting he acted only as agent and had no control over extrajudicial distribution.

Michael Gilfillan and Mrs Mary Bogle otherwise Gilfillan v. William Guthrie — Answers, 8 Jul 1823

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by William Guthrie to the petition and complaint of Michael Gilfillan and Mrs Mary Bogle, arguing that he did not improperly circulate the summons

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 376
  • Page 377
  • Page 378
  • Page 379
  • Current page 380
  • Page 381
  • Page 382
  • Page 383
  • Page 384
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in