Earl of Dunmore v. Robert Gray, Esq. and Others — Answers, 13 Feb 1824
Abstract
Respondents deny Mr Jack was a partner, arguing the 1799 agreement implied mutual risk and profit-sharing, not unilateral liability.
Trustees of the deceased Mr. Thomas Jack v. George Earl of Dunmore — Condescendence and Answers, 14 Feb 1822
Abstract
Lord Dunmore condescends to admit Mr. Jack was a partner until Oct 1799, and that he agreed to relieve him of future claims, with arbitral decree supporting his claim for prior period losses.
Petition — George Earl of Dunmore against Lord Meadowbank's Interlocutors
Abstract
Petitioner challenges interlocutors upholding £500+ interest liability, asserting Mr. Jack was a copartner, not factor, and his losses should be offset by prior payments made on his behalf.
William Maule, Esq. v. The Honourable William Maule of Panmure — Answers, 3 Jan 1824
Abstract
Respondent defends against petitioner’s claims to estates and leases, asserting prior judgments and prescription have extinguished all rights.
Petition — William Maule, Esq. against Lord Alloway's Interlocutor
Abstract
Petition of William Maule, Esq. asking the Court to recall Lord Alloway's interlocutor and remit the case to proceed
James Lyall v. John Cruden Blair — Answers, 22 May 1824
Abstract
Respondent defends right to take way-going crop from Bowie's Planting under 1823 award covering both farms with landlord.
No. III. ATTESTED COPY of the INTERLOCUTOR pronounced by LORD ELDIN, Ordinary on the Bill of Suspension for John CRUDEN BLAIR, Tenant in Lundin of Gallery; AGAINST James Lyall, Esq
Abstract
Petition of Charles Young, for Mr Hutchison, asking the Court to appoint inspectors to prescribe farming methods for Lundin of Gallery, and to find John Cruden Blair liable for expenses
No. II. BILL of SUSPENSION for J. C. BLAIR.
Abstract
Complainer seeks suspension of removal decree for Bowie's Planting, claiming his 1789 lease entitles him to harvest the 1824 crop before Whitsunday.
Petition — James Lyall, Esq. against Lord Eldin's Interlocutor [2]
Abstract
Petitioner seeks interdict against advocator’s ploughing of Bowie’s Planting, claiming lease expired at Whitsunday 1824; advocator counters he is entitled to away-going crop.
William Ogilvie v. George Robertson — Replies, 8 Apr 1824
Abstract
Replies for William Ogilvie, Spirit-dealer, Canongate, to the Answers for George Robertson, Horse-dealer in Canongate, and Henry Wharton, Writer in Edinburgh, arguing that the Court must require proof of concurring creditors' debts under the statute
