Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Reclaiming Petition — Mrs Eliz. Mitchell against Lord Meadowbank's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioners seek to be exonerated from paying a debt claimed by the pursuer, arguing that unstamped receipts from 1816–1818 are legally valid evidence of payment.

Petition — Mrs Eliz. Mitchell against Lord Meadowbank's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of Mrs ELIZ. MITCHELL, asking the Court to overturn Lord Meadowbank's interlocutor

East Lothian Banking Company and William Paul v. Mathew Turnbull — Answers, 8 Apr 1824

Abstract
AI-generated
Turnbull denies sale of bank shares, asserting only a security agreement existed and petitioners lack standing.

East Lothian Banking Company of Dunbar and William Paul v. Matthew Turnbull — Answers

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender Matthew Turnbull denies being a partner or accepting a transfer of shares in the East Lothian Banking Company, asserting the transaction was a security arrangement, not a sale.

No. III. CONDESCENDENCE for the East Lothian Banking Company of Dunbar, and William Paul, Accountant in Edinburgh, as Trustee and Manager and Cashier of the said East Lothian Banki

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers claim Mathew Turnbull is liable for unpaid stock calls after accepting transferred shares, despite later denying partnership status.

Petition — East Lothian Banking Company against Lord Meadowbank's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioners challenge an interlocutor dismissing their action against Mr. Turnbull, asserting his invalid transfer of bank shares due to procedural defects and misrepresentation.

David Weatherley and Sir James Hall, Bart. v. Mathew Turnbull — Answers, 24 Feb 1824

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Mathew Turnbull, Surgeon in Coldstream, to the petition of David Weatherley and Sir James Hall, Bart., for his interest.

Sir James Hall and David Weatherly v. Mathew Turnbull — Answers [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
MatheW Turnbull, Surgeon in Coldstream, denies agreeing to buy shares or be bound by the Bank's articles, countering Sir James Hall and David Weatherly.

David Weatherly and Sir James Hall v. Mathew Turnbull — Additional Appendix, 28 Jan 1824 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Additional appendix to petition by David Weatherly and Sir James Hall against Matthew Turnbull, surgeon, concerning tenancy of Redheugh and interest.

David Wetherley v. Mathew Turnbull — Answers, 26 May 1823

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Matthew Turnbull, Surgeon in Coldstream, to the petition of David Wetherley and Sir James Hall, Bart., denying any agreement for sale or transfer of Bank shares and asserting no valid transfer occurred.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 359
  • Page 360
  • Page 361
  • Page 362
  • Current page 363
  • Page 364
  • Page 365
  • Page 366
  • Page 367
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in