Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

No. XVII. CONDESCENDENCE for George Hunter.

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer George Hunter seeks damages for defender Basil Cochrane's breach of partnership agreement, including refusal to sell estate and imposition of burdens, with accountant to review financial impact.

No. XIV. MINUTE for the Honourable BASIL COCHRANE.

Abstract
AI-generated
Cochrane seeks exclusive title to unsold Auchterarder estate under agreed valuation and contract, challenging Hunter’s unjust interference after his claim was deemed invalid.

No. XII. MINUTE for the Honourable Basil Cochrane. No. XIII. REPORT by Mr George Brown.

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner Basil Cochrane seeks valuation of unsold Auchterarder estate lands, with reporter George Brown submitting updated assessment after prior failed sale and market depreciation.

No. IX. MINUTE for the Honourable Basil Cochrane, May 14, 1818.

Abstract
AI-generated
Cochrane seeks to resell unsold lots of Auchterarder estate with revised divisions and prices, challenging Hunter’s objection to prior sale terms.

The Honourable Basil Cochrane v. George Hunter — Information, 4 Sep 1823

Abstract
AI-generated
Information of the Honourable Basil Cochrane, arguing that George Hunter breached their agreement by mismanaging the estate and withholding accounts

Joseph Scouller v. James and William Campbell and Company and Henry Leishman — Answers, 4 Sep 1823

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent seeks restoration of poinded goods removed in breach of diligence, challenging petitioners' claim of respondent's delay.

APPENDIX. No. I. PURSUER'S PROOF. DECLARATION of the defender James Campbell. No. II. DEFENDERS' PROOF. DECLARATION of the Pursuer Joseph Scouller. No. III. DEPOSITIONS which were

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders claim title to goods via advance payment to Picken, who later proposed composition; pursuer asserts prior claim and seeks interdict against sale.

Petition — James & William Campbell & Co. against Lord Cringletie's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioners challenge an interlocutor granting an advocator's claim to goods they acquired in good faith after a poinding, arguing the advocator’s delay and lack of objection waived his right.

SKETCH Referred to in the Proof for D. COCHRAN J. Robertson Lithography Edin.

Abstract
AI-generated
Sketch map showing distances and locations relevant to land dispute involving possession and damages.

Petition — Rev. William Strang against Lord Gillies' Interlocutors

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of Rev. William Strang, against Lord Gillies' interlocutors, asking the Court to alter the interlocutor which assoilzied the defenders from the whole conclusions of the action

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 365
  • Page 366
  • Page 367
  • Page 368
  • Current page 369
  • Page 370
  • Page 371
  • Page 372
  • Page 373
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in