Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Sir James Hall and David Weatherley v. Matthew Turnbull and Others — 4 May 1822

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers claim defender breached contract by reneging on absolute transfer of bank shares after meeting at Dunbar, despite prior payment and acknowledgment of final agreement.

Sir James Hall and David Weatherly v. Mathew Turnbull — Condescendence, 4 May 1822

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers claim they transferred bank shares to Defender for £200, which he used to pay off his father’s bond obligation, but later sought to void the deal after bank collapse.

Petition — D. Weatherley & Sir J. Hall, Bart. against Lord Meadowbank's Interlocutor [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioners challenge Lord Meadowbank's interlocutor declaring a sale of bank shares to Turnbull, asserting the transfer was valid and Turnbull must accept it or be deemed a partner.

Petition — Malcolm Gillespie against Lord Eldin’s Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner seeks suspension of interlocutor rejecting his bill, alleging unlawful seizure of whisky on Sunday, jurisdictional error, and procedural irregularity by Aberdeen justices.

Mrs Mary Hendrie v. Dr George Hendrie — Petition, 18 May 1824

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of Mrs Mary Green or Hendrie, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor regarding her entitlement to expences in a dispute over her late husband's estate and the legitim claims of his children.

James Marr v. Robert Mowbray — Answers, 13 Jan 1824

Abstract
AI-generated
Robert Mowbray, trustee, defends against James Marr’s petition to set aside a £69:9:6 bill indorsed by bankrupt Andrew Christie, arguing it was not a preference but part of ongoing trade.

Petition — James Marr against an Inner-House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of James Marr asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

James Marr v. Robert Mowbray — Answers, 13 Feb 1828

Abstract
AI-generated
Robert Mowbray, trustee, answers James Marr’s petition challenging preferential sales to bankrupt Andrew Christie before sequestration.

Robert Mowbray v. James Marr — Condescendence [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Condescendence of Robert Mowbray, Esq. Merchant in Leith, Trustee on the Sequestrated Estate of Andrew Christie, against James Marr, Merchant in Leith, offering to prove certain preferences obtained within 60 days of bankruptcy.

Petition — James Marr against Lord Pitmilly's Interlocutor [3]

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of James Marr asking the Court to alter Lord Pitmilly's interlocutor, which reduced and set aside transactions between Marr and bankrupt Andrew Christie

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 360
  • Page 361
  • Page 362
  • Page 363
  • Current page 364
  • Page 365
  • Page 366
  • Page 367
  • Page 368
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in