Christopher Tod Brown v. Robert Nimmo — Answers, 22 Apr 1824
Abstract
Robert Nimmo seeks legal costs for obtaining a decree after the Sheriff denied his account claim, reversed on appeal.
Robert Nimmo v. Christopher Tod Brown — Answers, 21 Nov 1823
Abstract
Defender challenges necessity of answering petition for extract dues after decree was paid and petitioner forced answer despite prior settlement.
Petition — Christopher Tod Brown, Whip Manufacturer, Leith Walk
Abstract
Petitioner seeks costs in Court of Session after Sheriff’s interlocutor denied his expenses, arguing he was not litigant at fault and pursuer’s new objection was raised too late.
Petition — Dr. James Henderson against Lord Cringletie's Interlocutor
Abstract
Petition of Dr. James Henderson asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
Henry Holywell v. Robert Frank — Duplies, 1 Jun 1824
Abstract
Respondent challenges pursuer’s claim to benefit of cessio bonorum, disputing his account of payments, whereabouts, and creditors, asserting embezzlement and lack of merit for relief.
Henry Holywell v. Robert Frank — Replies, 22 May 1824
Abstract
Replies by Henry Holywell to the Answers for Robert Frank, asserting that he did not abscond with L.140 and that his debts are less than claimed.
William Raeburn v. William Reid — Answers, 8 Apr 1824 [2]
Abstract
William Reid, tacksman and factor, defends a sheriff’s warrant enforcing a four-week notice clause in his contract with former collier William Raeburn, rejecting Raeburn’s claims of entrapment and absurdity.
CSP-81 unsorted seg023
Abstract
Collier appeals summary imprisonment order enforcing Sheriff’s interlocutor requiring return to work and four weeks’ service.
William Raeburn v. William Reid — Memorial, 3 Jan 1824
Abstract
Memorial of William Raeburn, arguing that he is entitled to suspension and liberation against William Reid, Esq., factor and tacksman, in the process of his instance.
