SCOS Archive | The University of Virginia Law Library

Abstract

February 26, 1793 Answers by John Laird, Merchant in Greenock, to the petition of Archibald and John Robertsons, Insurance Brokers there, responding to the argument that the voyage alteration rendered the policy void.

Abstract

AI-generated

January 24, 1793 Reclaiming Petition of Archibald Robertson & Co. asking the Court to alter its prior interlocutor against Mr John Laird, merchant in Greenock.

Abstract

AI-generated

December 18, 1792 Petition of Arch. & Ja. Robertson, & Co. against Lord Justice Clerk's interlocutor, arguing that the vessel's voyage was not a deviation and Mr Laird is liable for the original policy

Abstract

AI-generated

June 26, 1792: Pursuer seeks correction of charter/infeftment to reflect true 1722 marriage contract succession, not heirs-male in general.

Subscribe to

Archibald and John Robertsons v. John Laird — Answers, 26 Feb 1793

Archibald and James Robertson v. John Laird — Petition, 24 Jan 1793

Robertson — Petition, 18 Dec 1792

Francis Pinkerton Drummond v. William Abernethy Drummond, &c — Petition, 30 May 1793

Francis Pinkerton Drummond v. William Abernethy Drummond, &c — Information, 4 Jul 1792

Capt. F. Drummond v. Mary Ogilvie — Information, 26 Jun 1792

Lang v. Macausland — Answers, 1793

Lang v. Macausland — Petition, 5 Jun 1793

Douglas, Heron, & Company v. William Riddick — Duplies, 21 Feb 1793

Douglas, Heron, & Company v. William Riddick — Replies, 9 Feb 1793