January 8, 1793 Complainers' Case of Margaret Bayne and David Miller, pursuers, against Sir John Wishart-Belsches and James Knox, defenders, challenging the validity of a settlement executed by Thomas Ruthven.
February 14, 1793 Information of James Scott, Esq, arguing that the defender's sheep trespassed on his grounds and that the statute of 1686, cap. 11, applies to recover penalties
February 23, 1793 Information of James Ross, arguing that James Scott has no right to pasture sheep on the scattald of Upwall and Houlls, and that local customs do not override the statute of 1686.
December 12, 1793 Petition of the petitioner asking the Court to permit a renewal of the act and commission for proving, against the respondent, allegations of the late Viscount's incapacity and undue influence by Mr. Gillies
John, Viscount of Arbuthnott, petitions to alter a recent interlocutor, arguing the defender must produce evidence of a farm-victual transaction proving his incapacity and that withholding his own books is improper.
Viscount of Arbuthnot petitions May 28, 1793 to alter Court’s interlocutor, claiming it unduly restricts his right to examine witnesses and obtain key writings proving his father’s deeds, and that defender’s conduct caused delay.
January 10, 1793 Information of defenders, arguing that the statute under which they are prosecuted does not authorize the seizure of unstamped starch without prior notice or opportunity to comply