AI-generated

Rev. David Wilkie petitions Dec 4, 1792 for full free teind as stipend and communion allowance, citing prior parish precedents and current rental surplus over old teind valuations.

AI-generated

November 13, 1792 Information of the Heritors of Forfar, arguing that the church should be divided in proportion to population, against Patrick Carnegy, Esq; Ja. Young Agent. H. (Lord HENDERLAND Reporter.)

AI-generated

November 11, 1792 Information of Patrick Carnegie, Robert Fletcher, George Dempster, Charles Hunter, and others, arguing that the church in Forfar should not be divided according to population but by valued rent as settled by Lord Coalston's decree

AI-generated

April 12, 1792 Answers by John Ballantyne, Banker in Ayr, to the petition of James M'Gregor and others, Trustees for the Creditors of William Bogle, late Merchant in Glasgow, responding to the claim for repayment of trust stock.

AI-generated

March 9, 1792: Wylie, Paisley Union Bank agent, declares he discounted a £84 bill, noting distinct handwriting and no added letters to inflate sums, relying on Pagan’s credit, not March’s, and confirming no protest, with bank’s usual discount threshold above £10.

AI-generated

December 2, 1791 Petition of James Macgregor and others, Trustees for the Creditors of Mr William Bogle, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

AI-generated

October 11, 1792 Answers by John Scott of Heatherieknow and others to the petition of the Principal and Professors of the College of Glasgow, responding to the demand for payment of valued teinds in victual.

AI-generated

May 28, 1892 Reclaiming Petition of the Principal and Professors of the College of Glasgow, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

AI-generated

May 28, 1792 Petition of the Principal and Professors of the College of Glasgow asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

AI-generated

February 20, 1792 Answers by Sir William Forbes and Company to the petition and additional petition of Catharine Ross and Alexander Mackenzie, arguing that the respondents are not liable for damages as the broker and underwriters were directly responsible.