Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Thomas Cranstoun, Common Agent in the Locality of Peebles v. Miss Elliot and Others — Petition, 28 May 1799

Abstract
AI-generated
May 28, 1799 Petition of Thomas Cranstoun, Writer to the Signet, asking the Court to alter Lord Dunsinnan's interlocutor

William Graham v. The Creditors of Harry Graham — Objections

Abstract
AI-generated
William Graham, heir of entail, objects to creditors’ claims against entailed Hourston estate, arguing debts are invalid due to post-entail timing and defective adjudications.

William Graham v. The Creditors of Harry Graham — Minutes, 1 Dec 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
December 1, 1792 Minute of Decanus for William Graham, heir of entail of Hourston, arguing that the common agent Mr Young improperly supports objections out of the common fund while also answering them, violating his duty to defend all parties equally.

Andrew Stuart v. Lord Frederick Campbell — Information, 3 Jul 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
Andrew Stuart, John Davidson, and Andrew Steele assert Crown commission grants them lawful authority over the general Register of Seisins and receipt of particular register books.

Frederick Campbell v. Andrew Stuart — Information, 26 Nov 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
Lord Clerk Register sues Andrew Stuart to reclaim authority over sasine registers under the 1617 Act, challenging Stuart’s commission and demanding surrender of unmarked books.

John Wilson and Others v. James Scott and Others — Petition, 25 Jan 1793

Abstract
AI-generated
January 25, 1793 Petition of the late Deacon and Masters of the Incorporation of Hammermen in Glasgow, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

John Wilsone and others v. James Scott and others — Note, 14 Jan 1793

Abstract
AI-generated
January 14, 1793 Note of John Wilson and others, against James Scott and others, stating the financial history and assessment of the Incorporation of Hammermen in Glasgow.

James Scott and Others v. John Wilson and Others — Information, 11 Oct 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
October 11, 1792 Information of James Scott late Deacon and others, Members of the Incorporation of Hammermen in Glasgow, arguing that the corporation has legal power to apply its funds for public reform purposes

John Wilsone v. James Scott — Information, 6 Sep 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
September 6, 1792 Information of John Wilson, &c., arguing that the defenders unlawfully applied L.20 from the Hammermen Incorporation's funds to a burgh reform

David Wilkie v. Heritors of the Parish of Cult — Answers, 18 Dec 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
Dec 18, 1792: Heritors of Cult reply to David Wilkie’s petition, claiming the Court lacks power to award extra stipend beyond allocated teinds.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 254
  • Page 255
  • Page 256
  • Page 257
  • Current page 258
  • Page 259
  • Page 260
  • Page 261
  • Page 262
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in