Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Petition — Alexander Irvine of Drum, and his Curators

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of Alexander Irvine of Drum, asking the Court to alter the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor and compel the defenders to produce all writs and deeds called for in the summons, or grant certification.

Petition — Colin Macdonald of Boisdale, and Angus Macdonald, late tenant in Heftimal [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioners seek to overturn an interlocutor finding Heftimal and Craigorry exclusively owned by defender, and demand damages for ejectment and kelp seizure.

Hugh Leslie v. Ann Lady Ashburton — Case, 4 Oct 1827

Abstract
AI-generated
Leslie seeks payment of £152 6s from Lady Ashburton via arrestment, but Peacock claims the debt was paid in 1823 and the arrestment is invalid.

Hugh Leslie v. Ann, Lady Ashburton and John Mowbray — Note of Pleas in Law

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer claims £95.5.7 due from Lady Ashburton via agent Mowbray, contested by defender over arrestment and payment via factor Gilchrist.

Hugh Leslie v. Lady Ashburton — Summons, 22 Oct 1824 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer seeks forthcoming payment from Lady Ashburton and John Mowbray for sums arrested in their hands, claiming debt owed by Thomas Peacock, with defenders asserting innocence and prior payment by agent.

Magistrates of Inverness v. Matthew Montgomerie, Writer in Glasgow, and Others, Trustees under the Deed of Settlement of the deceased John Bell, Merchant in Glasgow, and Walter Bell, Junior — Reclaiming Note, 19 May 1827

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders seek to discharge personal liability for ground-rent under a feu-contract, arguing it is a land burden, not a personal obligation.

James Alexander v. James Hill and George Scott — Information, 15 Nov 1824 [3]

Abstract
AI-generated
Information of James Alexander, arguing that the defenders are bound for L. 800 under letters of guarantee, despite their plea that liability is limited to debts payable within three months

James Alexander v. James Hill and George Scott — Information, 15 Nov 1824

Abstract
AI-generated
James Alexander sues James Hill and George Scott for unspecified damages in the Second Division.

James Alexander v. James Hill and George Scott — Information, 10 Mar 1827

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer James Alexander sues farmers James Hill and George Scott for debt; defenders' revised answers and pleas authenticated by Lord Ordinary.

ADDITION to the Condescendence for Miss Scott.

Abstract
AI-generated
Miss Scott seeks recovery of £500 plus interest from her brother, who has paid £200 without receipts, while a suspender denies any liability under a bond assignation.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 147
  • Page 148
  • Page 149
  • Page 150
  • Current page 151
  • Page 152
  • Page 153
  • Page 154
  • Page 155
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in