Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Robert Home-Gordon v. John Gordon — Replies, 6 Jan 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
January 6, 1791 Replies for Robert Home-Gordon of Embo, Esq; to the Answers for John Gordon of Carrol, Esq, arguing that the respondent's wadset qualification is nominal and fictitious, and that his possession has altered since enrolment.

Robert Home-Gordon v. John Gordon — Answers, 18 Dec 1790

Abstract
AI-generated
December 18, 1790 Answers by John Gordon of Carrol to the petition and complaint of Robert Home-Gordon and others, responding to objections regarding his qualification for the roll.

Robert Home Gordon, George M'Kay and others v. John Gordon of Carroll — Petition and Complaint, 12 Nov 1790

Abstract
AI-generated
November 12, 1790 Petition and Complaint of Robert Home Gordon, Esq; of Embo, George M'Kay of Bigbouse, Esq; and others, asking the Court to order the expunging of John Gordon of Carroll's name from the roll of freeholders of Sutherland

Robert Home-Gordon v. John Gordon

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

Robert Home-Gordon v. Hugh Rose — Answers, 18 Feb 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
February 18, 1791 Answers by Hugh Rose of Aitnoch to the condescendence of Robert Home-Gordon, responding to allegations concerning his wadset qualification and land possession.

Robert Home-Gordon of Embo v. Hugh Rose of Aitnoch — Condescendence, 8 Feb 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
February 8, 1791 Condescendence of Robert Home-Gordon, Esq. against Hugh Rose, Esq. T. Manson, Agent, referring to prior condescendence against Lieutenant M'Kenzie

Robert Home-Gordon v. Hugh Rose — Replies, 27 Jan 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
January 27, 1791 Replies for Robert Home-Gordon, Esquire, of Embo, and others, to the Answers for Hugh Rose, Esquire, of Aitnoch

Robert Home Gordon of Embo and George Mackay of Bighouse v. Hugh Rose of Aitnoch — Answers, 14 Jan 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
January 14, 1791 Answers by Hugh Rose of Aitnoch to the petition and complaint of Robert Home Gordon of Embo and George Mackay of Bighouse, responding to allegations of nominal and fictitious qualification.

Robert Home-Gordon v. Hugh Rose — Petition and Complaint, 12 Nov 1790

Abstract
AI-generated
November 12, 1790 Petition of Robert Home Gordon, Esq; and others, asking the Court to find that Hugh Rose's qualification is nominal and fictitious, and to expunge his name from the roll of freeholders of Sutherland.

Robert Home-Gordon v. Hugh Rose

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 145
  • Page 146
  • Page 147
  • Page 148
  • Current page 149
  • Page 150
  • Page 151
  • Page 152
  • Page 153
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in