Thomson — Answers, 20 Apr 1782
Abstract
April 20, 1782 Answers by the suspenders to the argument of Andrew Thomson that he alone is entitled to the bill's contents
Thomson — Petition, 6 Mar 1782
Abstract
March 6, 1782 Petition of Andrew Thomson asking the Court to alter its interlocutor suspending the letters simpliciter and to find the suspenders liable in expences
William Thomson in Cairnybridge and Andrew Tod of Feal v. Andrew Thomson in Burnmiln — Answers, 19 Feb 1782
Abstract
February 19, 1782 Information of the suspender Andrew Tod, arguing that the petitioner Andrew Thomson improperly filled his name as sole drawer on a bill granted jointly with Alexander Ruffell
Thomson — Petition, 25 Jan 1782
Abstract
January 25, 1782 Petition of Andrew Thomson asking the Court to alter its interlocutor concerning a bill of suspension involving himself and Alexander Ruffel against suspenders William Thomson and Andrew Tod
Campbell and Others, posterior Adjudgers v. The Common Agent for the Postponed Creditors in the Ranking of the Creditors of Charles Maclean of Kinlochaline — petition, 1 Jul 1801
Abstract
July 1, 1801: Petition by David Campbell et al. to reclaim against Inner-House interlocutor, arguing creditors with ready debt grounds may be conjoined in subsequent adjudications consistent with bankrupt-acts.
Sir Alexander Campbell, Baronet v. David Ballingall — Petition, 8 Feb 1791 [2]
Abstract
February 8, 1791 Petition of Sir Alexander Campbell of Ardkinlass Bart. and other Freeholders of the County of Stirling, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
Sir Alexander Campbell and others v. David Balingall — Answers, 27 Jan 1791 [2]
Abstract
January 27, 1791 Answers by David Balingall to the condescendence for Sir Alexander Campbell and others, asserting that no act or deed of his altered his right or possession
Sir Alexander Campbell, Bart. and Others v. Mr. David Ballengall — Condescendence, 20 Jan 1791
Abstract
January 20, 1791 Condescendence of Sir Alexander Campbell, Bart. and Others, against Mr. David Ballengall, asserting that the respondent has no right to vote for Stirlingshire as he acquiesced in the vassals' possession and payment of feu-duties to Lady Elphinston since 1781.
Sir Alexander Campbell of Ardkinlass, John Johnston of Alva and Captain John Livingston v. David Ballingall — Replies, 23 Dec 1790
Abstract
Complainers demand titles or face expungement, citing post-Lord Elphinston’s death revocation of Lady Elphinston’s conveyance and nullity of respondent’s claim.
Sir Alexander Campbell, Bart., John Johnston of Alva, Esq., and Captain John Livingston v. David Balingall, Esq. — Answers, 9 Dec 1790
Abstract
December 9, 1790 Answers by David Balingall, Esq. to the petition and complaint of Sir Alexander Campbell, Bart., John Johnston of Alva, Esq., and Captain John Livingston, asserting that the complaint is inept because no judgment was pronounced to strike him off the roll.
