Robert Spier v. James Dunlop — Answers

Abstract
Defender James Dunlop denies conspiring with bankrupt John Dunlop to secure £220 via a property sale; jury finds no agreement but confirms £220 was obtained from sale proceeds as provision for bill.

Thomas Hislop v. John Nairne — Condescendence

Abstract
Condescendence of the Reverend Thomas Hislop, averring that the defenders were present at congregational meetings and thus bound by the stipend offer of May 4, 1815, and that their actions as commissioners do not absolve them from liability.