Andrew Chalmer v. James Pringle — Answers, 29 Nov 1764
Abstract
Dr James Pringle’s Nov 29, 1764 reply to Andrew Chalmer’s petition, defending his prior paper’s legal statements as accurate, not injurious, and urging private clarification over public complaint.
Dr James Pringle v. Mr Andrew Chalmer — Duplies, 28 Nov 1764
Abstract
November 28, 1764 Duplies for Dr James Pringle physician in Richmond, to the Replies for Mr Andrew Chalmer writer in Edinburgh, as in right of the deceased Alexander Deans, and his creditors.
Creditors of Robert Deans v. Dr. James Pringle — Petition, 1 Oct 1764
Abstract
October 1, 1764 Petition of Andrew Chalmer asking the Court to remit the accusation against him made by Dr James Pringle, that he charged sums intromitted with by Mr Thomas Mackenzie to Mrs Campbell and then again to the respondent
Creditors of the deceased Robert Deans v. Dr James Pringle — Answers, 8 Aug 1764
Abstract
August 8, 1764 Answers by Dr James Pringle physician in Richmond to the petition of the creditors of the deceased Robert Deans, responding to objections raised against his interest.
Creditors of Robert Deans v. Dr. James Pringle — Petition, 11 Jul 1764
Abstract
July 11, 1764: Creditors petition court to review interlocutor affecting Dr. James Pringle’s interest.
Gabriel Peter v. John Carmichael of Eastend — Answers, 4 Apr 1765
Abstract
April 4, 1765 Answers by John Carmichael of Eastend to the petition of Gabriel Peter, Baker in Edinburgh, responding to the argument that the assignation of the tack is void due to unenforceable verbal agreement.
John Carmichael v. Gabriel Peter — Petition, 26 Feb 1765
Abstract
February 26, 1765 Petition of Gabriel Peter baker asking the Court to alter the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor, which found him liable for full rent despite unfulfilled additional rent agreement with Cundell
