1765
John Carmichael pursued Gabriel Peter, a baker in Edinburgh, regarding rent claimed under a tack. The Lord Ordinary having found Peter liable for the full rent, Peter petitioned the Court to alter that interlocutor on the ground that an additional rent agreement with Cundell remained unfulfilled. Carmichael answered, contending that the assignation of the tack was void because it rested upon an unenforceable verbal agreement.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- John Carmichael v. Gabriel Peter — Petition, 26 Feb 1765February 26, 1765 Petition of Gabriel Peter baker asking the Court to alter the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor, which found him liable for full rent despite unfulfilled additional rent agreement with Cundell
- Gabriel Peter v. John Carmichael of Eastend — Answers, 4 Apr 1765April 4, 1765 Answers by John Carmichael of Eastend to the petition of Gabriel Peter, Baker in Edinburgh, responding to the argument that the assignation of the tack is void due to unenforceable verbal agreement.
People & places in this case
People involved
- John Carmichael — Defender
- Gabriel Peter — Pursuer
