Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Alexander Chalmers v. John Duff — Answers, 17 Jul 1787

Abstract
AI-generated
July 17, 1787: John Duff et al., Heritors of Cairney, reply to Rev. Alexander Chalmers’ petition, disputing the Court’s power to alter stipends already decreed.

Chalmers v. The Duke of Gordon — Petition, 6 Mar 1787

Abstract
AI-generated
March 6, 1787 Petition of Rev. Alexander Chalmers, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor in a teind-cause against the heritors of Cairney and Bottary

The Reverend Mr Alexander Chalmers v. His Grace Alexander, Duke of Gordon, and the other Heritors of the said United Parishes — Memorial, 28 Jun 1786

Abstract
AI-generated
June 28, 1786 Memorial of the Reverend Mr Alexander Chalmers, arguing that his stipend is inadequate and requesting modification to a competent sum suitable to the weight of the charge and parish circumstances.

Chalmers v. The Duke of Gordon

Repository & Extent

William & Mary School of Law, Wolf Library

Murray Grant v. Countess of Sutherland — Information, 14 Feb 1788

Abstract
AI-generated
February 14, 1788 Information of Murray Grant and Alexander Sharp, arguing that the claimant is entitled to be ranked as heir of line of Sutherland of Pronzie and to assert all five claims against the Countess of Sutherland and her creditors.

Murray Grant & Alexander Sharp v. Countess of Sutherland

Repository & Extent

William & Mary School of Law, Wolf Library

Munro v. Robertson — Petition, 27 Nov 1778

Abstract
AI-generated
November 27, 1778 Petition of George Munro asking the Court to permit him to use his inhibitions on three debts to draw payment from the parcel of lands where infeftment followed, rather than his arrestments

Munro v. Robertson

Repository & Extent

William & Mary School of Law, Wolf Library

William Douglas and Robert Graham v. George Carnegie — Answers, 2 Mar 1782

Abstract
AI-generated
March 2, 1782 Answers by George Carnegie of Pittarrow to the petition and complaint of William Douglas of Bridgetown and Robert Graham of Fintray, Esquires, responding to objections to his freeholder inrolment.

Douglas v. Carnegie

Repository & Extent

William & Mary School of Law, Wolf Library

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 69
  • Page 70
  • Page 71
  • Page 72
  • Current page 73
  • Page 74
  • Page 75
  • Page 76
  • Page 77
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in