Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Creditors of Sir James Carnegie v. David Carnegie — Petition, 7 Mar 1780

Abstract
AI-generated
March 7, 1780 Petition of Sir David Carnegie asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

Creditors of Sir James Carnegie v. David Carnegie

Repository & Extent

William & Mary School of Law, Wolf Library

Sir James Grant v. Simon Fraser — Petition, 4 Mar 1785

Abstract
AI-generated
March 4, 1785 Petition of Sir James Grant of Grant, Baronet, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

Sir James Grant v. Simon Fraser

Repository & Extent

William & Mary School of Law, Wolf Library

John Knox of Cartmore v. Jasper Marshal — Answers, 20 Feb 1765

Abstract
AI-generated
February 20, 1765 Answers by Jasper Marshal, Writer in Edinburgh, to the petition of John Knox of Cartmore and his Tenants, responding to arguments concerning a heritable bond and its discharge.

Knox v. Marshall — Petition, 5 Feb 1765

Abstract
AI-generated
February 5, 1765 Petition of John Knox of Cartmore, asking the Court to alter the interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary which found the pursuer entitled to mails and duties

Knox v. Marshall

Repository & Extent

William & Mary School of Law, Wolf Library

Mary Moffat v. John Smith and Isabel Colvin — Information, 4 Mar 1765

Abstract
AI-generated
March 4, 1765 Information of Mary Moffat, relict of George Colvin, arguing that the lease granted by her for her life was valid despite a restrictive clause in the marriage-contract, as the clause was not ingrossed in the infeftment and the tenant was in optima fide.

John Smith and Isobel Colvill v. Mary Moffat and John Sprott — Information, 21 Feb 1765

Abstract
AI-generated
Feb 21, 1765: Pursuers seek reduction of Widow Mary Moffat’s Liferent-tack, claiming her right ended by remarriage and children’s majority, voiding the Tack under resoluto jure dantis.

Smith v. Moffat

Repository & Extent

William & Mary School of Law, Wolf Library

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 68
  • Page 69
  • Page 70
  • Page 71
  • Current page 72
  • Page 73
  • Page 74
  • Page 75
  • Page 76
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in