Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

The Edinburgh and Glasgow Union Canal Company v. William Davidson — 15 Apr 1836

Abstract
AI-generated
Canal Company and landowner William Davidson submit to arbitration over land use and rock excavation costs, with arbiter Robert Bald issuing final decree after prior arbitrators' notes.

Edinburgh and Glasgow Union Canal Company v. William Davidson — Condescendence and Answers, 29 Nov 1834

Abstract
AI-generated
Canal Company claims rock quantity and value; Davidson disputes, demanding proof and criticizing the engineer’s estimate as biased.

Miss Rose Marguerette Plaine v. David Thomson — Note

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer objects to accountant’s report upholding unvouched payments, wrong interest, and excessive business fees in trust accounts.

ANSWERS for DAVID THOMSON, Esq. W.S., Respondent,— TO THE AMENDED THIRD HEAD of Special Objections for Miss ROSE M. PLAINE.

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by David Thomson, Esq. W.S., Respondent, to the amended third head of special objections for Miss Rose M. Plaine.

Miss Marguerite Plaine v. David Thomson — Answers

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by David Thomson, Esq. Writer to the Signet, sole surviving Trustee of the late Dr. Thomas Young, to the objections for Miss Marguerite Plaine, residing in Edinburgh.

Miss Rose Marguerite Plaine v. David Thomson — Statement of Facts, 19 Jan 1820

Abstract
AI-generated
Additional Statement of Facts for the Pursuer, and Answers for the Defender, with Pleas in Law and Objections to States of Accounts

Plaine v. Thomson — Appendix, 6 Jul 1836

Abstract
AI-generated
Accountant re-submits report on interest charges after pursuer's objections; Lord Ordinary remits case for further accounting review.

Malcolm Nicolson and Martin Martin v. Ralph Erskine Scott — Answers, 17 Jun 1836

Abstract
AI-generated
Ralph Erskine Scott, judicial factor for Alexander Macdonald’s estate, opposes Malcolm Nicolson’s petition for approval of a 5s. in the pound composition, citing procedural irregularities and insufficient creditor concurrence.

APPENDIX. REPORT by Martin Martin, Tacksman of Duntulm, Trustee on the Sequestrated Estate of Malcolm Nicolson, residing at Ullinish, Cattle-Dealer, Grazier, and Fish-Curer in the

Abstract
AI-generated
Trustee Martin Martin reports creditor meetings, estate valuations, and approval of a 5s per pound composition offer for Malcolm Nicolson’s sequestrated estate in Skye.

Petition — Malcolm Nicolson, residing at Ullinish, in the Isle of Skye, Cattle-Dealer, Grazier, and Fish-Curer, and of Martin Martin, Tacksman of Duntulm, Trustee on his Sequestrated Estate, with concurrence of nine-tenths, both in number and value…

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of Malcolm Nicolson and Martin Martin, asking the Court to approve a composition offer accepted by nine-tenths of creditors and to discharge Nicolson of debts prior to sequestration

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 262
  • Page 263
  • Page 264
  • Page 265
  • Current page 266
  • Page 267
  • Page 268
  • Page 269
  • Page 270
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in